On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Thomas E Enebo <[email protected]> wrote:
> How big would the launcher be if we statically linked libc? That is
> the only dynamic load library we have right? A little extra size with
> zero dyn-linking issues may be worth it....
libc seems like one of those things that would have tons of
kernel-specific defines and macros and calls that really need to be
compiled on a per-system basis. I could be wrong, but my gut tells me
that making a single statically-linked libc work across linux versions
would be really hard...
- Charlie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
