On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Thomas E Enebo <tom.en...@gmail.com> wrote: > How big would the launcher be if we statically linked libc? That is > the only dynamic load library we have right? A little extra size with > zero dyn-linking issues may be worth it....
libc seems like one of those things that would have tons of kernel-specific defines and macros and calls that really need to be compiled on a per-system basis. I could be wrong, but my gut tells me that making a single statically-linked libc work across linux versions would be really hard... - Charlie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email