Hi Glen,

apologies, mail was left on drafts and forgot to sent it.. let's go to one
source of record and see if that helps in being able to edit the site. We
can look after automating site's publishing after we got a working site


br,
juan pablo


On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:

> JP, no response, I'm taking this as a "yes" from you (or at least no veto)
> that we can go back to one source of record for the docs and close 5943.
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
>
> On 09/05/2013 03:14 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll ask if they're OK with us reverting to the old location (I
>> really don't think they're set up for the new location, as I linked below,
>> the [2] you gave is ambiguous about whether the location needs to be at a
>> root level, as I'm supposing, or within the source code folder.)  *You're*
>> OK though if I cancel 5943, i.e. whatever spiffying up you'd like to do for
>> the ChangeLog page can be done via us editing HTML for changelog and you
>> creating CSS?  (I don't care much about publishing the ChangeLog page as
>> few other Apache projects post theirs so I don't want to work much in this
>> area, I'll leave the spiffying to you but am fine with editing an HTML
>> ChangeLog page as I've said before.)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Glen
>>
>> On 09/05/2013 02:01 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Glen,
>>>
>>> I'm not really sure requesting a rollback to the old location would fix
>>> the
>>> issue:
>>>
>>> - the original location has been, and is, available since the very
>>> beginning of the SVN relocation, so if the rollback to that URL would fix
>>> the site, I presume that would be easily done long ago. I asked a few
>>> days
>>> ago @INFRA-6611 if we could/have to do something in order to have that
>>> issue resolved, no response so far
>>>
>>> - the new/pretented/requested/**whatever svn's site location [#1] also
>>> follow
>>> the Apache CMS constraints for a CMS site folder [#2], mainly the trunk
>>> directory
>>>
>>> As for the /jspwiki subfolder, it isn't the responsible of us being
>>> unable
>>> to edit the site, it's there b/c we still have the incubator sub-site
>>> structure; it behaves like a normal CMS sub-folder. Also while Infra
>>> solves
>>> the issue, some tweaks have been made, so that jspwiki.apache.org shows
>>> /jspwiki content, the /jspwiki isn't needed right now to browse the site.
>>>
>>> My impression, per [#3], is that the cause of us not being able to edit
>>> the
>>> site is related to the CMS underlying svnpubsub mechanism, so it doesn't
>>> matter where the site is located right now. In any case, if you're going
>>> to
>>> delete + request site relocation to the original url, please ask infra
>>> before for confirmation that this would allow normal site publishing,
>>> seeing how all those JIRA ticket had evolved I'm not very sure.. :-/
>>>
>>>
>>> br,
>>> juan pablo
>>>
>>>
>>> [#1]: $svn/trunk/jspwiki-site/src/**site/trunk
>>> [#2]: 
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.**html#constraints<http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#constraints>
>>> [#3]:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6577?**
>>> focusedCommentId=13724554&**page=com.atlassian.jira.**
>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:**comment-tabpanel#comment-**13724554<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6577?focusedCommentId=13724554&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13724554>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  JP, if I understand what you're saying, "If we could have one working
>>>> location+configuration, be it A' or B' or whatever, I'd be fine with it,
>>>> it'll be better than our current situation", I'm now welcome to delete
>>>> jspwiki/trunk/jspwiki-site so we'll just have the single standard
>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk that they're used to (indeed they *required* the
>>>> roller/site/trunk format when I got Roller on the Apache CMS:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-5631?**<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-5631?**>
>>>> focusedCommentId=13547018&****page=com.atlassian.jira.**
>>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:****comment-tabpanel#comment-****13547018<
>>>> https://issues.**apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-**5631?focusedCommentId=*
>>>> *13547018&page=com.atlassian.**jira.plugin.system.**
>>>> issuetabpanels:comment-**tabpanel#comment-13547018<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5631?focusedCommentId=13547018&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13547018>>.)
>>>>
>>>> And then I can close JSPWiki-787, JSPWIKI-5943, and JSPWIKI-6611 and
>>>> submit
>>>> an Infra JIRA to make the JSPWiki URL (jspwiki.apache.org/jspwiki) just
>>>> like the Roller URL (roller.apache.org) on the Apache CMS, i.e., get
>>>> rid
>>>> of the "jspwiki" subdirectory from the URL.  So we'll be back to having
>>>> a
>>>> single site we can update via normal Apache CMS processes described on
>>>> the
>>>> Edit Website page of the JSPWiki site.
>>>>
>>>> Further, whatever prettying up you wish to do of the ChangeLog file can
>>>> instead be done via CSS and/or us adding our changes in via HTML as
>>>> mentioned below, no more autogeneration, OK?
>>>>
>>>> We have to get this issue fixed, and simplifying it to whatever Infra's
>>>> accustomed to seems to be the best way to go.  (Indeed, in JSPWIKI-6611,
>>>> Daniel has stated our problem is that we're no longer using the
>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk location they're expecting:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/*
>>>> *jira/browse/INFRA-6611?****focusedCommentId=13729382&**
>>>> page=com.atlassian.jira.****plugin.system.issuetabpanels:****
>>>> comment-tabpanel#comment-****13729382<https://issues.**
>>>> apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-**6611?focusedCommentId=**
>>>> 13729382&page=com.atlassian.**jira.plugin.system.**
>>>> issuetabpanels:comment-**tabpanel#comment-13729382<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6611?focusedCommentId=13729382&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13729382>>)
>>>>
>>>> This project has lots of difficulties already, at least let's get rid of
>>>> the crippled website issue.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Glen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------****--------
>>>>
>>>> JP Wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Glen, well not exactly.
>>>>
>>>> Site's src began at location "A" in the SVN tree. We opened INFRA-5943,
>>>> and to make things easier to infra, site's src was copied to location
>>>> "B",
>>>> in order to make the site transition seamless. Graduation came, and the
>>>> SVN
>>>> was migrated, A location became A' and B became B'. So far so good.
>>>>
>>>> The site was migrated directly from A to B', which seems to be the cause
>>>> of INFRA-6611. As I've understood from INFRA-6611, it should've gone
>>>> from A
>>>> to A' to B' or from A to B to B', solving 5943 and 6611 one after
>>>> another.
>>>> Going from A to B' in one step has been the cause of the current
>>>> problems
>>>> with the website. AFAIK, sticking with the old site location won't solve
>>>> the issue as it still exists right now, it's CMS configuration problem;
>>>> I'm
>>>> not 100% sure, but seems it has to be recreated (cfr. with INFRA-6492,
>>>> duplicate of 6611). If we could have one working
>>>> location+configuration, be
>>>> it A' or B' or whatever, I'd be fine with it, it'll be better than our
>>>> current situation..
>>>>
>>>> Tomorrow is the board meeting, with our report stating this issue,
>>>> hopefully it should draw some attention to it br, juan pablo
>>>>
>>>> On 08/20/2013 10:12 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  JP, it's looking like the website delays are due in part to your moving
>>>>> the site folder under our source trunk, and not in the site/cms or
>>>>> whatever
>>>>> folder Apache CMS that is accustomed to: https://issues.apache.org/**
>>>>> jira/browse/INFRA-6611?****focusedCommentId=13729365&**
>>>>> page=com.atlassian.jira.****plugin.system.issuetabpanels:****
>>>>> comment-tabpanel#comment-****13729365<https://issues.**
>>>>> apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-**6611?focusedCommentId=**
>>>>> 13729365&page=com.atlassian.**jira.plugin.system.**
>>>>> issuetabpanels:comment-**tabpanel#comment-13729365<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6611?focusedCommentId=13729365&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13729365>>.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Further, this was done to satisfy INFRA-5943, autogeneration of the
>>>>> website so the change log would look nicer. I.e., the entire website is
>>>>> apparently being crippled just so one page looks perhaps 30% better via
>>>>> HTML and CSS.  That's leaving aside the problem that 5943 means we
>>>>> won't
>>>>> have a staging website to review our changes anymore (all commits go
>>>>> directly to prod) as well as that every svn code commit presently
>>>>> reports a
>>>>> distracting update to the website pages.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I have a better solution for us.  How about we rename the
>>>>> ChangeLog to OldChangeLog2 or whatever and move it out of the root.
>>>>>  In its
>>>>> place, give us a brand-new, empty ChangeLog.html containing a
>>>>> commented-out
>>>>> template for us to copy at the top and use everytime we make a change.
>>>>>  I
>>>>> always blog in pure HTML, so it's absolutely *nothing* for me to
>>>>> update the
>>>>> ChangeLog in HTML. Then link to the HTML page on our website instead,
>>>>> so it
>>>>> will be nice and formatted as desired and always updated with the
>>>>> latest
>>>>> information (no auto-publishing needed).  You can put the CSS at the
>>>>> top of
>>>>> the ChangeLog or store it at the jspwiki site directory and just
>>>>> reference
>>>>> it in.  Then we can get the site folder out of the source code trunk
>>>>> and
>>>>> back where Apache CMS is coded to expect it, we resume having the
>>>>> staging/publish site again, our commits just show the code we changed
>>>>> with
>>>>> no auto updates to the site, and Infra is happy with us again.  How
>>>>> does
>>>>> that sound?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you would prefer a more automated solution than us directly updating
>>>>> the HTML file (I'm personally fine with that, though), rather than
>>>>> roll-our-own I would recommend a JIRA enhancement request (and patch,
>>>>> if
>>>>> you wish) to the Apache CMS team for what you have in mind so it gets
>>>>> implemented there in a standard fashion for all teams.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Glen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07/31/2013 08:46 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  OK, good, you're clearly aware of the issue.  I'll focus on code
>>>>>> instead...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07/31/2013 06:43 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hi Glen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't mind if INFRA-5943 gets done now or in two months, as it'll
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> extra (to publish a nice changelog after every commit), but right now
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> afraid we're unable to update the site, see comments on INFRA-6577
>>>>>>> (JSPWiki
>>>>>>> TLP: common tasks) and INFRA-6611 (Error updating JSPWiki CMS site).
>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>> JIRA shouldn't stop manual edits of the website happening though,
>>>>>>> i.e.:
>>>>>>> when a new release is done
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, regarding the site SVN location, until INFRA-6492 gets done,
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> $svn/site/trunk (although we can't push content or move the jspwiki
>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>> one level up right now), and afterwards will be
>>>>>>> $svn/trunk/jspwiki-site/src/****site/trunk This should be
>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> INFRA-5943
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As soon as we are able to edit the website again, I was hoping to
>>>>>>> edit
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> remove all the incubating stuff and publish the site under
>>>>>>> jspwiki.a.o
>>>>>>> instead of jspwiki.a.o/jspwiki. My idea is to ping infra again by
>>>>>>> tomorrow
>>>>>>> night to give some space to all these JIRAs (although we've been
>>>>>>> over a
>>>>>>> week with half site and without a front page :-/)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> br,
>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   JP, can we hold off on INFRA-5943 (just cancel it for now) so we
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>> the http://jspwiki.apache.org/ page fully active (no more linking
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> HTML index) and I can remove the "(incubating)" references? Just
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> do INFRA-6492 and make it clear 5943 is withdrawn. This will entail
>>>>>>>> deleting one of our two "jspwiki-site" directories--you tell me
>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>> one--I don't want to be juggling two sources of record for our
>>>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd like to hold off on 5943 until the jspwiki.org wiki pages are
>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>> copied over (and also the IT tests are working, if I may get greedy
>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>    Whatever its merits (and I've always seen just a link to SVN for
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> changelog good enough), Apache Infra just doesn't have the time to
>>>>>>>> work on
>>>>>>>> it, they presently have 115 other "major" issues in JIRA and the
>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> complex 5943 may be prohibiting them from completing 6492. I don't
>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>> we can afford a several-week wait, we need to remove the
>>>>>>>> "incubating"
>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The current fully documented vanilla Apache CMS process (
>>>>>>>> http://jspwiki.apache.org/******jspwiki/development/edit_****<http://jspwiki.apache.org/****jspwiki/development/edit_****>
>>>>>>>> website.html<http://jspwiki.**apache.org/**jspwiki/**
>>>>>>>> development/edit_**website.**html<http://jspwiki.apache.org/**jspwiki/development/edit_**website.html>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <http://jspwiki.**apache.org/**jspwiki/**development/edit_**
>>>>>>>> website.html<http://apache.org/jspwiki/**development/edit_website.html>
>>>>>>>> <http://jspwiki.**apache.org/jspwiki/**
>>>>>>>> development/edit_website.html<http://jspwiki.apache.org/jspwiki/development/edit_website.html>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **),
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> where we commit to SVN, go to the staging site to see if we like it,
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> then hit the publish button if we do has worked fine, I've never
>>>>>>>> had a
>>>>>>>> problem with it and I've done more website updates the past several
>>>>>>>> months
>>>>>>>> than anyone here.  (Do you know how to use it by the way? The edit
>>>>>>>> page --
>>>>>>>> the staging site -- the publish button?  I don't know if you want to
>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>> from the current process because you haven't tried out the current
>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>> yet...)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 07/22/2013 01:18 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Hi Glen,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I tried to do the same edit this morning, same results, I think
>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>> related to INFRA-6492 (still open) and the relocation of SVN:
>>>>>>>>> editing
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> site via CMS bookmarklet yields an "Error 500" page, with the
>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>> message: "Repository has been moved: Repository moved permanently
>>>>>>>>> to '
>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/******asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/****<https://svn.apache.org/repos/****asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/****>
>>>>>>>>> content/jspwiki<https://svn.**apache.org/repos/**asf/**
>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk/**content/**jspwiki<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/**content/jspwiki>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://svn.**apache.org/**repos/asf/jspwiki/**<http://apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>> site/trunk/content/jspwiki<htt**ps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**
>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk/content/**jspwiki<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/content/jspwiki>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ';
>>>>>>>>> please relocate at /usr/local/cms/webgui/lib/ASF/**
>>>>>>>>> ****CMS/WC/Commit.pm
>>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>>> 62".
>>>>>>>>> As per INFRA-6492, it seems the site still needs some tweaking in
>>>>>>>>> order to
>>>>>>>>> be fully usable
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regarding the site folder, once INFRA-6492 gets completed, the site
>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>> should be $svn/trunk/jspwiki-site/src/******site/trunk (I'd
>>>>>>>>> prefer to
>>>>>>>>> delete
>>>>>>>>> $svn/site/trunk once INFRA-6492 gets resolved, just in case)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regarding the extra jspwiki folder at jspwiki.a.o/jspwiki: the site
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> been partially transferred, having the same strucure it had when
>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>> of incubator.a.o, and needed to be one level down (the jspwiki
>>>>>>>>> folder), in
>>>>>>>>> order to not "pollute" the main incubator.a.o. Once the site is
>>>>>>>>> relocated
>>>>>>>>> we will be able to push content one level up, effectively
>>>>>>>>> dismissing
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> extra jspwiki we have right now. In that sense I feel INFRA-6572
>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>> closed as invalid/duplicated/related to INFRA-6492
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, when you say you can't commit right now, you are referring
>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the site or to all svn 
>>>>>>>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/****<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**>
>>>>>>>>> **asf/jspwiki/trunk/<https://**svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/**
>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/trunk/ <https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/jspwiki/trunk/>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://**svn.apache.org/**repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/>
>>>>>>>>> <htt**ps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/trunk/>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ).
>>>>>>>>> The first one should be expected 'til we get solved INFRA-6492, the
>>>>>>>>> second
>>>>>>>>> one shouldn't happen, right now committer access is given to the
>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>> apache id's for jspwiki:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> juanpablo@minotaur:~$ list_unix_group.pl jspwiki
>>>>>>>>> ajaquith
>>>>>>>>> altheim
>>>>>>>>> brushed
>>>>>>>>> clr
>>>>>>>>> csauer
>>>>>>>>> florianh
>>>>>>>>> gmazza
>>>>>>>>> henning
>>>>>>>>> jalkanen
>>>>>>>>> juanpablo
>>>>>>>>> metskem
>>>>>>>>> rubys
>>>>>>>>> snoopdave
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Finally, I'll file the required JIRA for transferring resources
>>>>>>>>> incubator
>>>>>>>>> -> TLP as soon as I get through all the last e-mails this week
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> br,
>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Glen Mazza<[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    Hi Juan Pablo, I made an update to jspwiki/jspwiki-site (namely,
>>>>>>>>> removed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  the "(Incubating)" from the title page -- index.html) but the
>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>> not propagate to the website:http://jspwiki.******
>>>>>>>>>> staging.apache.<
>>>>>>>>>> http://**jspwiki.staging.**apache <http://jspwiki.staging.apache*
>>>>>>>>>> *>.>
>>>>>>>>>> **org/jspwiki/<**http://****jspwiki.staging.apache.<http:/**
>>>>>>>>>> /jspwiki.staging.apache <http://jspwiki.staging.apache>.>
>>>>>>>>>> **org/**jspwiki/<http://**jspwiki. <http://jspwiki.>**
>>>>>>>>>> staging.apache.org/**jspwiki/<http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://jspwiki.**staging.apache.org/jspwiki/<http://jspwiki.staging.apache.org/jspwiki/>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      I also noticed that the old "site" directory hasn't been
>>>>>>>>>> deleted
>>>>>>>>>> yet:
>>>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/********jspwiki/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/******jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.**apache.org/viewvc/****jspwiki/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/****jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.apache.**org/**viewvc/**jspwiki/<http://svn.**
>>>>>>>>>> apache.org/viewvc/**jspwiki/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**jspwiki/>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.apache.**org/****viewvc/jspwiki/<http://svn.**
>>>>>>>>>> apache.org/viewvc/jspwiki/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**
>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jspwiki/>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>      I assumed as a part of your automated site generation, we
>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>> have one folder for our website that would store everything --
>>>>>>>>>> either
>>>>>>>>>> "site" or "jspwiki/jspwiki-site" -- is that not the case? Can we
>>>>>>>>>> consolidate to one folder?  Also, could you update the Edit page:
>>>>>>>>>> http://jspwiki.staging.apache.********org/jspwiki/development/**
>>>>>>>>>> ****
>>>>>>>>>> edit_**
>>>>>>>>>> website.html<http://jspwiki.******staging.apache.org/jspwiki/****<http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://staging.apache.org/**jspwiki/**<http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/**>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> development/edit_website.html<****http://jspwiki.staging.**
>>>>>>>>>> apache. <http://jspwiki.staging.apache.>**
>>>>>>>>>> org/jspwiki/development/edit_****website.html<http://jspwiki.**
>>>>>>>>>> staging.apache.org/jspwiki/**development/edit_website.html<http://jspwiki.staging.apache.org/jspwiki/development/edit_website.html>
>>>>>>>>>> >**>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  **for the new website generation process, remove what's no longer
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  relevant
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and add a blurb explaining the new stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PS: I can't commit anything myself right now.  I put in an Infra
>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> get my (and potentially everyone else's) karma restored:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/********jira/browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6574>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>> <http**s://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6574>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>> <http**://issues.apache.org/jira/****browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6574>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to