Hi Glen,

just've closed it, hope we get the website edit back soon!


br,
juan pablo


On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:

> I presently can't close INFRA-5943 as I'm not the original reporter (I
> just left a comment), would you be able to do so?
>
> Glen
>
>
> On 09/07/2013 12:17 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>
>> Hi Glen,
>>
>> apologies, mail was left on drafts and forgot to sent it.. let's go to one
>> source of record and see if that helps in being able to edit the site. We
>> can look after automating site's publishing after we got a working site
>>
>>
>> br,
>> juan pablo
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  JP, no response, I'm taking this as a "yes" from you (or at least no
>>> veto)
>>> that we can go back to one source of record for the docs and close 5943.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Glen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/05/2013 03:14 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>>
>>>  OK, I'll ask if they're OK with us reverting to the old location (I
>>>> really don't think they're set up for the new location, as I linked
>>>> below,
>>>> the [2] you gave is ambiguous about whether the location needs to be at
>>>> a
>>>> root level, as I'm supposing, or within the source code folder.)
>>>>  *You're*
>>>> OK though if I cancel 5943, i.e. whatever spiffying up you'd like to do
>>>> for
>>>> the ChangeLog page can be done via us editing HTML for changelog and you
>>>> creating CSS?  (I don't care much about publishing the ChangeLog page as
>>>> few other Apache projects post theirs so I don't want to work much in
>>>> this
>>>> area, I'll leave the spiffying to you but am fine with editing an HTML
>>>> ChangeLog page as I've said before.)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Glen
>>>>
>>>> On 09/05/2013 02:01 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi Glen,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not really sure requesting a rollback to the old location would fix
>>>>> the
>>>>> issue:
>>>>>
>>>>> - the original location has been, and is, available since the very
>>>>> beginning of the SVN relocation, so if the rollback to that URL would
>>>>> fix
>>>>> the site, I presume that would be easily done long ago. I asked a few
>>>>> days
>>>>> ago @INFRA-6611 if we could/have to do something in order to have that
>>>>> issue resolved, no response so far
>>>>>
>>>>> - the new/pretented/requested/****whatever svn's site location [#1]
>>>>> also
>>>>>
>>>>> follow
>>>>> the Apache CMS constraints for a CMS site folder [#2], mainly the trunk
>>>>> directory
>>>>>
>>>>> As for the /jspwiki subfolder, it isn't the responsible of us being
>>>>> unable
>>>>> to edit the site, it's there b/c we still have the incubator sub-site
>>>>> structure; it behaves like a normal CMS sub-folder. Also while Infra
>>>>> solves
>>>>> the issue, some tweaks have been made, so that jspwiki.apache.orgshows
>>>>> /jspwiki content, the /jspwiki isn't needed right now to browse the
>>>>> site.
>>>>>
>>>>> My impression, per [#3], is that the cause of us not being able to edit
>>>>> the
>>>>> site is related to the CMS underlying svnpubsub mechanism, so it
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>> matter where the site is located right now. In any case, if you're
>>>>> going
>>>>> to
>>>>> delete + request site relocation to the original url, please ask infra
>>>>> before for confirmation that this would allow normal site publishing,
>>>>> seeing how all those JIRA ticket had evolved I'm not very sure.. :-/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> br,
>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [#1]: $svn/trunk/jspwiki-site/src/****site/trunk
>>>>> [#2]: 
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.****html#constraints<http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.**html#constraints>
>>>>> <http://www.**apache.org/dev/cms.html#**constraints<http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#constraints>
>>>>> >
>>>>> [#3]:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6577?**<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6577?**>
>>>>> focusedCommentId=13724554&****page=com.atlassian.jira.**
>>>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:****comment-tabpanel#comment-****
>>>>> 13724554<https://issues.**apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-**
>>>>> 6577?focusedCommentId=**13724554&page=com.atlassian.**
>>>>> jira.plugin.system.**issuetabpanels:comment-**
>>>>> tabpanel#comment-13724554<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6577?focusedCommentId=13724554&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13724554>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   JP, if I understand what you're saying, "If we could have one working
>>>>>
>>>>>> location+configuration, be it A' or B' or whatever, I'd be fine with
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> it'll be better than our current situation", I'm now welcome to delete
>>>>>> jspwiki/trunk/jspwiki-site so we'll just have the single standard
>>>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk that they're used to (indeed they *required* the
>>>>>> roller/site/trunk format when I got Roller on the Apache CMS:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-5631?**<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-5631?**>
>>>>>> <http**s://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-5631?**<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-5631?**>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> focusedCommentId=13547018&******page=com.atlassian.jira.**
>>>>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:******comment-tabpanel#comment-****
>>>>>> **13547018<
>>>>>> https://issues.**apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-**5631?**
>>>>>> focusedCommentId=*<http://apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-**5631?focusedCommentId=*>
>>>>>> *13547018&page=com.atlassian.****jira.plugin.system.**
>>>>>> issuetabpanels:comment-****tabpanel#comment-13547018<http**
>>>>>> s://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-5631?**
>>>>>> focusedCommentId=13547018&**page=com.atlassian.jira.**
>>>>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:**comment-tabpanel#comment-**13547018<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5631?focusedCommentId=13547018&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13547018>
>>>>>> >>.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And then I can close JSPWiki-787, JSPWIKI-5943, and JSPWIKI-6611 and
>>>>>> submit
>>>>>> an Infra JIRA to make the JSPWiki URL (jspwiki.apache.org/jspwiki)
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> like the Roller URL (roller.apache.org) on the Apache CMS, i.e., get
>>>>>> rid
>>>>>> of the "jspwiki" subdirectory from the URL.  So we'll be back to
>>>>>> having
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> single site we can update via normal Apache CMS processes described on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Edit Website page of the JSPWiki site.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Further, whatever prettying up you wish to do of the ChangeLog file
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> instead be done via CSS and/or us adding our changes in via HTML as
>>>>>> mentioned below, no more autogeneration, OK?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have to get this issue fixed, and simplifying it to whatever
>>>>>> Infra's
>>>>>> accustomed to seems to be the best way to go.  (Indeed, in
>>>>>> JSPWIKI-6611,
>>>>>> Daniel has stated our problem is that we're no longer using the
>>>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk location they're expecting:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/*
>>>>>> *jira/browse/INFRA-6611?******focusedCommentId=13729382&**
>>>>>> page=com.atlassian.jira.******plugin.system.issuetabpanels:******
>>>>>> comment-tabpanel#comment-******13729382<https://issues.**
>>>>>> apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-****6611?focusedCommentId=**<http://apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-**6611?focusedCommentId=**>
>>>>>> 13729382&page=com.atlassian.****jira.plugin.system.**
>>>>>> issuetabpanels:comment-****tabpanel#comment-13729382<http**
>>>>>> s://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6611?**
>>>>>> focusedCommentId=13729382&**page=com.atlassian.jira.**
>>>>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:**comment-tabpanel#comment-**13729382<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6611?focusedCommentId=13729382&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13729382>
>>>>>> >>)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This project has lots of difficulties already, at least let's get rid
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the crippled website issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------******--------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JP Wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Glen, well not exactly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Site's src began at location "A" in the SVN tree. We opened
>>>>>> INFRA-5943,
>>>>>> and to make things easier to infra, site's src was copied to location
>>>>>> "B",
>>>>>> in order to make the site transition seamless. Graduation came, and
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> SVN
>>>>>> was migrated, A location became A' and B became B'. So far so good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The site was migrated directly from A to B', which seems to be the
>>>>>> cause
>>>>>> of INFRA-6611. As I've understood from INFRA-6611, it should've gone
>>>>>> from A
>>>>>> to A' to B' or from A to B to B', solving 5943 and 6611 one after
>>>>>> another.
>>>>>> Going from A to B' in one step has been the cause of the current
>>>>>> problems
>>>>>> with the website. AFAIK, sticking with the old site location won't
>>>>>> solve
>>>>>> the issue as it still exists right now, it's CMS configuration
>>>>>> problem;
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> not 100% sure, but seems it has to be recreated (cfr. with INFRA-6492,
>>>>>> duplicate of 6611). If we could have one working
>>>>>> location+configuration, be
>>>>>> it A' or B' or whatever, I'd be fine with it, it'll be better than our
>>>>>> current situation..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tomorrow is the board meeting, with our report stating this issue,
>>>>>> hopefully it should draw some attention to it br, juan pablo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/20/2013 10:12 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   JP, it's looking like the website delays are due in part to your
>>>>>> moving
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the site folder under our source trunk, and not in the site/cms or
>>>>>>> whatever
>>>>>>> folder Apache CMS that is accustomed to:
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**
>>>>>>> jira/browse/INFRA-6611?******focusedCommentId=13729365&**
>>>>>>> page=com.atlassian.jira.******plugin.system.issuetabpanels:******
>>>>>>> comment-tabpanel#comment-******13729365<https://issues.**
>>>>>>> apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-****6611?focusedCommentId=**<http://apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-**6611?focusedCommentId=**>
>>>>>>> 13729365&page=com.atlassian.****jira.plugin.system.**
>>>>>>> issuetabpanels:comment-****tabpanel#comment-13729365<http**
>>>>>>> s://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6611?**
>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=13729365&**page=com.atlassian.jira.**
>>>>>>> plugin.system.issuetabpanels:**comment-tabpanel#comment-**13729365<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6611?focusedCommentId=13729365&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13729365>
>>>>>>> >>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Further, this was done to satisfy INFRA-5943, autogeneration of the
>>>>>>> website so the change log would look nicer. I.e., the entire website
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> apparently being crippled just so one page looks perhaps 30% better
>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>> HTML and CSS.  That's leaving aside the problem that 5943 means we
>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>> have a staging website to review our changes anymore (all commits go
>>>>>>> directly to prod) as well as that every svn code commit presently
>>>>>>> reports a
>>>>>>> distracting update to the website pages.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I have a better solution for us.  How about we rename the
>>>>>>> ChangeLog to OldChangeLog2 or whatever and move it out of the root.
>>>>>>>   In its
>>>>>>> place, give us a brand-new, empty ChangeLog.html containing a
>>>>>>> commented-out
>>>>>>> template for us to copy at the top and use everytime we make a
>>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>>   I
>>>>>>> always blog in pure HTML, so it's absolutely *nothing* for me to
>>>>>>> update the
>>>>>>> ChangeLog in HTML. Then link to the HTML page on our website instead,
>>>>>>> so it
>>>>>>> will be nice and formatted as desired and always updated with the
>>>>>>> latest
>>>>>>> information (no auto-publishing needed).  You can put the CSS at the
>>>>>>> top of
>>>>>>> the ChangeLog or store it at the jspwiki site directory and just
>>>>>>> reference
>>>>>>> it in.  Then we can get the site folder out of the source code trunk
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> back where Apache CMS is coded to expect it, we resume having the
>>>>>>> staging/publish site again, our commits just show the code we changed
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> no auto updates to the site, and Infra is happy with us again.  How
>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>> that sound?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you would prefer a more automated solution than us directly
>>>>>>> updating
>>>>>>> the HTML file (I'm personally fine with that, though), rather than
>>>>>>> roll-our-own I would recommend a JIRA enhancement request (and patch,
>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> you wish) to the Apache CMS team for what you have in mind so it gets
>>>>>>> implemented there in a standard fashion for all teams.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/31/2013 08:46 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   OK, good, you're clearly aware of the issue.  I'll focus on code
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> instead...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 07/31/2013 06:43 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Hi Glen,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't mind if INFRA-5943 gets done now or in two months, as it'll
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>> extra (to publish a nice changelog after every commit), but right
>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>> afraid we're unable to update the site, see comments on INFRA-6577
>>>>>>>>> (JSPWiki
>>>>>>>>> TLP: common tasks) and INFRA-6611 (Error updating JSPWiki CMS
>>>>>>>>> site).
>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>> JIRA shouldn't stop manual edits of the website happening though,
>>>>>>>>> i.e.:
>>>>>>>>> when a new release is done
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, regarding the site SVN location, until INFRA-6492 gets done,
>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>> $svn/site/trunk (although we can't push content or move the jspwiki
>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>> one level up right now), and afterwards will be
>>>>>>>>> $svn/trunk/jspwiki-site/src/******site/trunk This should be
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> INFRA-5943
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As soon as we are able to edit the website again, I was hoping to
>>>>>>>>> edit
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> remove all the incubating stuff and publish the site under
>>>>>>>>> jspwiki.a.o
>>>>>>>>> instead of jspwiki.a.o/jspwiki. My idea is to ping infra again by
>>>>>>>>> tomorrow
>>>>>>>>> night to give some space to all these JIRAs (although we've been
>>>>>>>>> over a
>>>>>>>>> week with half site and without a front page :-/)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> br,
>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Glen Mazza <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    JP, can we hold off on INFRA-5943 (just cancel it for now) so we
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  get
>>>>>>>>>> the http://jspwiki.apache.org/ page fully active (no more linking
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>> HTML index) and I can remove the "(incubating)" references? Just
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>> do INFRA-6492 and make it clear 5943 is withdrawn. This will
>>>>>>>>>> entail
>>>>>>>>>> deleting one of our two "jspwiki-site" directories--you tell me
>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>> one--I don't want to be juggling two sources of record for our
>>>>>>>>>> website.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to hold off on 5943 until the jspwiki.org wiki pages are
>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>> copied over (and also the IT tests are working, if I may get
>>>>>>>>>> greedy
>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>     Whatever its merits (and I've always seen just a link to SVN
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> changelog good enough), Apache Infra just doesn't have the time to
>>>>>>>>>> work on
>>>>>>>>>> it, they presently have 115 other "major" issues in JIRA and the
>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> complex 5943 may be prohibiting them from completing 6492. I don't
>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>> we can afford a several-week wait, we need to remove the
>>>>>>>>>> "incubating"
>>>>>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The current fully documented vanilla Apache CMS process (
>>>>>>>>>> http://jspwiki.apache.org/********jspwiki/development/edit_******<http://jspwiki.apache.org/******jspwiki/development/edit_****>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://jspwiki.apache.org/******jspwiki/development/edit_******<http://jspwiki.apache.org/****jspwiki/development/edit_****>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> website.html<http://jspwiki.****apache.org/**jspwiki/**<http://apache.org/**jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>> development/edit_**website.****html<http://jspwiki.apache.**
>>>>>>>>>> org/**jspwiki/development/**edit_**website.html<http://jspwiki.apache.org/**jspwiki/development/edit_**website.html>
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <http://jspwiki.**apache.org/****jspwiki/**development/edit_**<http://apache.org/**jspwiki/**development/edit_**>
>>>>>>>>>> website.html<http://apache.**org/jspwiki/**development/**
>>>>>>>>>> edit_website.html<http://apache.org/jspwiki/**development/edit_website.html>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> <http://jspwiki.**apache.org/**jspwiki/**<http://apache.org/jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> development/edit_website.html<**http://jspwiki.apache.org/**
>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/development/edit_**website.html<http://jspwiki.apache.org/jspwiki/development/edit_website.html>
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  **),
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  where we commit to SVN, go to the staging site to see if we
>>>>>>>>>> like it,
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> then hit the publish button if we do has worked fine, I've never
>>>>>>>>>> had a
>>>>>>>>>> problem with it and I've done more website updates the past
>>>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>>>> months
>>>>>>>>>> than anyone here.  (Do you know how to use it by the way? The edit
>>>>>>>>>> page --
>>>>>>>>>> the staging site -- the publish button?  I don't know if you want
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> switch
>>>>>>>>>> from the current process because you haven't tried out the current
>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>> yet...)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 07/22/2013 01:18 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    Hi Glen,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  I tried to do the same edit this morning, same results, I think
>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>> related to INFRA-6492 (still open) and the relocation of SVN:
>>>>>>>>>>> editing
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> site via CMS bookmarklet yields an "Error 500" page, with the
>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>> message: "Repository has been moved: Repository moved permanently
>>>>>>>>>>> to '
>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/********asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/****
>>>>>>>>>>> **<https://svn.apache.org/repos/******asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/****>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://svn.apache.org/**repos/****asf/jspwiki/site/**
>>>>>>>>>>> trunk/****<https://svn.apache.org/repos/****asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/****>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> content/jspwiki<https://svn.****apache.org/repos/**asf/**<http://apache.org/repos/**asf/**>
>>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk/**content/****jspwiki<https://svn.apache.**
>>>>>>>>>>> org/repos/**asf/jspwiki/site/**trunk/**content/jspwiki<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/**content/jspwiki>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://svn.**apache.org/****repos/asf/jspwiki/**<http://apache.org/**repos/asf/jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/****<http://apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> site/trunk/content/jspwiki<**htt**ps://svn.apache.org/**
>>>>>>>>>>> repos/asf/** <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**>
>>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/site/trunk/content/****jspwiki<https://svn.apache.**
>>>>>>>>>>> org/repos/asf/jspwiki/site/**trunk/content/jspwiki<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/site/trunk/content/jspwiki>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ';
>>>>>>>>>>> please relocate at /usr/local/cms/webgui/lib/ASF/****
>>>>>>>>>>> ****CMS/WC/Commit.pm
>>>>>>>>>>> line
>>>>>>>>>>> 62".
>>>>>>>>>>> As per INFRA-6492, it seems the site still needs some tweaking in
>>>>>>>>>>> order to
>>>>>>>>>>> be fully usable
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the site folder, once INFRA-6492 gets completed, the
>>>>>>>>>>> site
>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>> should be $svn/trunk/jspwiki-site/src/********site/trunk (I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> prefer to
>>>>>>>>>>> delete
>>>>>>>>>>> $svn/site/trunk once INFRA-6492 gets resolved, just in case)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the extra jspwiki folder at jspwiki.a.o/jspwiki: the
>>>>>>>>>>> site
>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>> been partially transferred, having the same strucure it had when
>>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>>>> of incubator.a.o, and needed to be one level down (the jspwiki
>>>>>>>>>>> folder), in
>>>>>>>>>>> order to not "pollute" the main incubator.a.o. Once the site is
>>>>>>>>>>> relocated
>>>>>>>>>>> we will be able to push content one level up, effectively
>>>>>>>>>>> dismissing
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> extra jspwiki we have right now. In that sense I feel INFRA-6572
>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>> closed as invalid/duplicated/related to INFRA-6492
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also, when you say you can't commit right now, you are referring
>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> the site or to all svn 
>>>>>>>>>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/******<https://svn.apache.org/repos/****>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://svn.apache.org/**repos/**<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> **asf/jspwiki/trunk/<https://****svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/**
>>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/trunk/ <https://svn.apache.org/repos/**
>>>>>>>>>>> **asf/jspwiki/trunk/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/jspwiki/trunk/>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://**svn.apache.org/****repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/<http://svn.apache.org/**repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/>
>>>>>>>>>>> <htt**p://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/****jspwiki/trunk/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> <htt**ps://svn.apache.org/**repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/>
>>>>>>>>>>> <htt**ps://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/**jspwiki/trunk/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jspwiki/trunk/>
>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ).
>>>>>>>>>>> The first one should be expected 'til we get solved INFRA-6492,
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> second
>>>>>>>>>>> one shouldn't happen, right now committer access is given to the
>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>> apache id's for jspwiki:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> juanpablo@minotaur:~$ list_unix_group.pl jspwiki
>>>>>>>>>>> ajaquith
>>>>>>>>>>> altheim
>>>>>>>>>>> brushed
>>>>>>>>>>> clr
>>>>>>>>>>> csauer
>>>>>>>>>>> florianh
>>>>>>>>>>> gmazza
>>>>>>>>>>> henning
>>>>>>>>>>> jalkanen
>>>>>>>>>>> juanpablo
>>>>>>>>>>> metskem
>>>>>>>>>>> rubys
>>>>>>>>>>> snoopdave
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Finally, I'll file the required JIRA for transferring resources
>>>>>>>>>>> incubator
>>>>>>>>>>> -> TLP as soon as I get through all the last e-mails this week
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> br,
>>>>>>>>>>> juan pablo
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Glen Mazza<[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>    wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     Hi Juan Pablo, I made an update to jspwiki/jspwiki-site
>>>>>>>>>>> (namely,
>>>>>>>>>>> removed
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>   the "(Incubating)" from the title page -- index.html) but the
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>> did
>>>>>>>>>>>> not propagate to the website:http://jspwiki.******
>>>>>>>>>>>> staging.apache.<
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://**jspwiki.staging.****apache <
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://jspwiki.staging.apache***
>>>>>>>>>>>> *>.>
>>>>>>>>>>>> **org/jspwiki/<**http://******jspwiki.staging.apache.<http:/**
>>>>>>>>>>>> **
>>>>>>>>>>>> /jspwiki.staging.apache <http://jspwiki.staging.apache**>.>
>>>>>>>>>>>> **org/**jspwiki/<http://****jspwiki. <http://jspwiki.>**
>>>>>>>>>>>> staging.apache.org/**jspwiki/<**http://staging.apache.org/**
>>>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/ <http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://jspwiki.**staging.**apache.org/jspwiki/<http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**jspwiki.staging.apache.org/**jspwiki/<http://jspwiki.staging.apache.org/jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       I also noticed that the old "site" directory hasn't been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> deleted
>>>>>>>>>>>> yet:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**********jspwiki/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/********jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.**apache.org/viewvc/********jspwiki/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/******jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.**apache.org/**viewvc/****jspwiki/<http://apache.org/viewvc/****jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://**svn.apache.org/viewvc/******jspwiki/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/****jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.apache.**org/****viewvc/**jspwiki/<http://svn.****
>>>>>>>>>>>> apache.org/viewvc/**jspwiki/<h**ttp://svn.apache.org/viewvc/***
>>>>>>>>>>>> *jspwiki/ <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**jspwiki/>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.apache.**org/******viewvc/jspwiki/<http://svn.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> apache.org/viewvc/jspwiki/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/****<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**jspwiki/<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jspwiki/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       I assumed as a part of your automated site generation, we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>> have one folder for our website that would store everything --
>>>>>>>>>>>> either
>>>>>>>>>>>> "site" or "jspwiki/jspwiki-site" -- is that not the case? Can we
>>>>>>>>>>>> consolidate to one folder?  Also, could you update the Edit
>>>>>>>>>>>> page:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://jspwiki.staging.apache.**********org/jspwiki/**
>>>>>>>>>>>> development/**
>>>>>>>>>>>> ****
>>>>>>>>>>>> edit_**
>>>>>>>>>>>> website.html<http://jspwiki.********staging.apache.org/**
>>>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki/**** <http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/****><
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://staging.**apache.org/jspwiki/**<http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://staging.apache.org/****jspwiki/**<http://staging.apache.org/**jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://staging.**apache.org/jspwiki/**<http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/**>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> development/edit_website.html<******http://jspwiki.staging.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> apache. <http://jspwiki.staging.apache**.>**
>>>>>>>>>>>> org/jspwiki/development/edit_******website.html<http://**
>>>>>>>>>>>> jspwiki. <http://jspwiki.>**
>>>>>>>>>>>> staging.apache.org/jspwiki/****development/edit_website.html<http://staging.apache.org/jspwiki/**development/edit_website.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <**http://jspwiki.staging.apache.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> org/jspwiki/development/edit_**website.html<http://jspwiki.staging.apache.org/jspwiki/development/edit_website.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> **>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   **for the new website generation process, remove what's no
>>>>>>>>>>>> longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>   relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> and add a blurb explaining the new stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PS: I can't commit anything myself right now.  I put in an Infra
>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> get my (and potentially everyone else's) karma restored:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**********jira/browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/********jira/browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <htt**ps://issues.apache.org/********jira/browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/******jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ht**tps://issues.apache.org/******jira/browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/******jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ht**tp://issues.apache.org/**jira/****browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http**s://issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http**s://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https:/**/issues.apache.org/******jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ht**tp://issues.apache.org/**jira/****browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http**://issues.apache.org/**jira/****browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/jira/****browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <htt**p://issues.apache.org/jira/****browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/****jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http**://issues.apache.org/jira/****browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/**jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<http://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https**://issues.apache.org/jira/**browse/INFRA-6574<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6574>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to