git seems to attract contributions from volunteers (at least github) on a slightly higher rate than svn.
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Jesse Sightler <[email protected]> wrote: > The whole offline advantage of git is largely irrelevant, IMO. The big win is > the improved workflow. It is far easier to make large patches via the > git/github model and submit via pull-requests than via patches attached to a > bug entry. I've done this quite a few times over the past year, and github > really is a huge win here, IMO. > > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Alex O'Ree <[email protected]> wrote: >> I personally prefer svn. I don't "git" it. What are the requirement >> for version control besides...well, version control in the context of >> jUDDI? Git is handy for getting the complete version history offline, >> but that point is pretty moot considering half of the internet is >> downloaded during the maven build process. It's a bit faster for >> certain actions and its useful for localized version control. SVN's >> advantage is that it is integrated with just about everything out >> there for software development. Just my two cents. I'll use whatever >> the rest of you all want >> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Jesse Sightler <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I hope this happens... I think it would be very good for the project. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kurt T Stam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi guys, >> >> >> >> What do you think about moving our repo from svn to git? Once it's on >> >> git.apache.org we can mirror it on github, and it will make it much easier >> >> for people to contribute code, even if they are not (yet) committers on >> >> the >> >> project. >> >> >> >> --Kurt >> > >> > >
