I think most arguments are in favor so I start a vote. Cheers --Kurt
On 3/6/13 7:58 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
git seems to attract contributions from volunteers (at least github)
on a slightly higher rate than svn.
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:53 PM, Jesse Sightler <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The whole offline advantage of git is largely irrelevant, IMO. The
big win is the improved workflow. It is far easier to make large
patches via the git/github model and submit via pull-requests than
via patches attached to a bug entry. I've done this quite a few times
over the past year, and github really is a huge win here, IMO.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Alex O'Ree <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I personally prefer svn. I don't "git" it. What are the requirement
for version control besides...well, version control in the context of
jUDDI? Git is handy for getting the complete version history offline,
but that point is pretty moot considering half of the internet is
downloaded during the maven build process. It's a bit faster for
certain actions and its useful for localized version control. SVN's
advantage is that it is integrated with just about everything out
there for software development. Just my two cents. I'll use whatever
the rest of you all want
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Jesse Sightler
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I hope this happens... I think it would be very good for the
project.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Kurt T Stam
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> What do you think about moving our repo from svn to git? Once
it's on
>> git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org> we can mirror it on
github, and it will make it much easier
>> for people to contribute code, even if they are not (yet)
committers on the
>> project.
>>
>> --Kurt
>
>
