Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote. Ryanne
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield < > andrew_schofi...@live.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang <ning2008w...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask" > > > > > > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai <snow4yo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right? > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan < > > ryannedo...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for > > the > > > > following > > > > > > small KIP: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group > > offsets to > > > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases. > > Currently, we > > > > rely > > > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and > > > > kafka-consumer-groups > > > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality > > into MM2 > > > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback > > workloads > > > > between > > > > > > clusters. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the votes! > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
