+1 (non-binding)
Navinder
On Tuesday, 14 January, 2020, 07:24:02 pm IST, Ryanne Dolan
<[email protected]> wrote:
Bump. We've got 4 non-binding and one binding vote.
Ryanne
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 1:44 AM Tom Bentley <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:33 PM Andrew Schofield <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On 12/12/2019, 14:20, "Mickael Maison" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Ryanne Dolan <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Bump. We've got 2 non-binding votes so far.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 3:32 PM Ning Zhang <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > My current plan is to implement this in "MirrorCheckpointTask"
> > > >
> > > > On 2019/11/02 03:30:11, Xu Jianhai <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I think this kip will implement a task in sinkTask ? right?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 1:06 AM Ryanne Dolan <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey y'all, Ning Zhang and I would like to start the vote for
> > the
> > > > following
> > > > > > small KIP:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-545%3A+support+automated+consumer+offset+sync+across+clusters+in+MM+2.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is an elegant way to automatically write consumer group
> > offsets to
> > > > > > downstream clusters without breaking existing use cases.
> > Currently, we
> > > > rely
> > > > > > on external tooling based on RemoteClusterUtils and
> > > > kafka-consumer-groups
> > > > > > command to write offsets. This KIP bakes this functionality
> > into MM2
> > > > > > itself, reducing the effort required to failover/failback
> > workloads
> > > > between
> > > > > > clusters.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the votes!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ryanne
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>
