Thanks for the KIP.

I am not sure how useful the timestamp and taskId information will be in
practice, but I don't have any concern with regard to
overhead/performance. Hence, as you think it might be useful, I trust
your judgement.

For the timestamp though, I would like to emphasize that I personally
think, that the idea (that was rejected) to track the "latest timestamp"
when a topic was used might be quite useful information. Of course, as
already mentioned, there could be a follow up to add this feature.


+1 (binding)


-Matthias

On 1/21/20 12:32 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Konstantine.  This will be very useful for Connect.
> 
> +1(binding)
> 
> -Bill
> 
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 2:12 PM Almog Gavra <al...@confluent.io> wrote:
> 
>> Another thanks from me! +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:04 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks again for the KIP and this improvement for Connect.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Randall
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:45 AM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP Konstantine.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 2:18 AM Konstantine Karantasis <
>>>> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to open the vote on KIP-558 that had a constructive flurry
>> of
>>>>> discussions in the past few days, in order to give this KIP the
>>>> opportunity
>>>>> to be voted on by the current KIP deadline (Wed, Jan 22, 2020), if -
>> of
>>>>> course - there's agreement upon its final form.
>>>>>
>>>>> KIP link here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-558%3A+Track+the+set+of+actively+used+topics+by+connectors+in+Kafka+Connect
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Konstantine
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to