I have 3 +1s and 1 +1(non-binding) vote for this Kip. Thank you all for the
feedback. I'll start working on the PR.

Thanks
Shailesh


On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:35 AM Brian Byrne <bby...@confluent.io> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding) - thanks!
>
> My only suggestion would be to make the enum-to-int conversion explicit for
> the new ConfigType, with a surrounding comment, to ensure that no
> accidental reordering and for easier readability should the response
> message message be read.
>
> Brian
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:13 AM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding. Thanks for the KIP 👍
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 4:44 AM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Shailesh,
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajini
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:37 AM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > > Looks great. Thanks for the proposal, Shailesh.
> > > >
> > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 6:00 AM, Shailesh Panwar <
> > span...@confluent.io
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-569: Update
> > > > > DescribeConfigsResponse to include additional metadata information
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The KIP is here:
> > > > > https:/ / cwiki. apache. org/ confluence/ display/ KAFKA/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> KIP-569%3A+DescribeConfigsResponse+-+Update+the+schema+to+include+additional+metadata+information+of+the+field
> > > > > (
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-569%3A+DescribeConfigsResponse+-+Update+the+schema+to+include+additional+metadata+information+of+the+field
> > > > > )
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Shailesh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Arthur
> >
>

Reply via email to