Good, good. Read through the discussions, the KIP looks good to me, +1 (non-binding)
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:51 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io> wrote: > Called out! > > Seems like gmail struggles with [...] prefixed subjects. You'd think they > would adapt > all their practices to conform to the Apache Kafka mailing list standards, > but no! > > +1 (non-binding) by the way > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:46 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Boyang, > > > > It is a separate thread, and you have just revealed yourself as a gmail > > user ;) > > > > (Gmail sometimes conflates vote and discuss threads for no apparent > reason > > ) > > > > -John > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020, at 13:39, Boyang Chen wrote: > > > Hey Matthias, should this be on a separate VOTE thread? > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:38 AM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks, Matthias! > > > > > > > > I’m +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > -John > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020, at 11:55, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to start the vote on KIP-572: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-572%3A+Improve+timeouts+and+retries+in+Kafka+Streams > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > > > > * signature.asc > > > > > > > > > >
