Thanks Guozhang,

For the PR review, the PR is already there in the KIP.

I am adding it here:

https://github.com/confluentinc/kafka/pull/242

It's not complete by any means but maybe one pass would be possible?

Thanks!
Sagar.

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:26 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Sagar, since the KIP is accepted, the next step would be to completing
> the PR review and finally merge it :)
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:46 AM Sagar <sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just wanted to know, what the next steps are wrt to the KIP?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sagar.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:17 PM Sagar <sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Thank you! I have marked the KIP as Accepted :)
> > >
> > > Regarding the point on InMemoryKeyValueStore, in the PR I had added the
> > > implementation for InMemoryKeyValueStore as well. I hadn't mentioned
> > about
> > > it in the KIP which I have done now as you suggested.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Sagar.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 8:10 PM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Sagar,
> > >>
> > >> Yes! Congratulations :)
> > >>
> > >> Now, you can mark the status of the KIP as "Accepted" and we
> > >> can move on to reviewing your PRs.
> > >>
> > >> One quick note: Matthias didn't have time to review the KIP
> > >> in full, but he did point out to me that there's a lot of
> > >> information about the RocksDB implementation and no mention
> > >> of the InMemory store. We both agree that we should
> > >> implement the new method also for the InMemory store.
> > >> Assuming you agree, note that we don't need to discuss any
> > >> implementation details, so you could just update the KIP
> > >> document to also mention, "We will also implement the new
> > >> method in the InMemoryKeyValueStore."
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for your contribution to Apache Kafka!
> > >> -John
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 09:30 +0530, Sagar wrote:
> > >> > Thanks All!
> > >> >
> > >> > I see 3 binding +1 votes and 2 non-binding +1s. Does it mean this
> KIP
> > >> has
> > >> > gained a lazy majority?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks!
> > >> > Sagar.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6:51 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Thanks for the KIP Sagar. I'm +1 (binding) too.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Guozhang
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:24 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Thanks for the KIP! This is a great addition to the streams API.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > +1 (binding)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > -Bill
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:33 PM Sagar <
> sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi All,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Bumping the thread again !
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > Sagar.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:08 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > >> > > sop...@confluent.io
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Thanks Sagar! +1 (non-binding)
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Sophie
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:37 PM Sagar <
> > >> sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Just thought of bumping this voting thread again to see if
> > we
> > >> can
> > >> > > > form
> > >> > > > > > any
> > >> > > > > > > consensus around this.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > > > Sagar.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 4:21 AM Adam Bellemare <
> > >> > > > > adam.bellem...@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > LGTM
> > >> > > > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 4:13 AM Sagar <
> > >> sagarmeansoc...@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Bumping this thread to see if there are any feedbacks.
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > > > > > Sagar.
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:49 AM John Roesler <
> > >> > > > vvcep...@apache.org>
> > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Sagar!
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > I’m +1 (binding)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > -John
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, at 02:05, Sagar wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > I would like to start a new voting thread for the
> > >> below KIP
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > > > add
> > >> > > > > > > > > prefix
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > scan support to state stores:
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > 614%3A+Add+Prefix+Scan+support+for+State+Stores
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > >> > >
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-614%3A+Add+Prefix+Scan+support+for+State+Stores
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sagar.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > -- Guozhang
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to