Thanks, Sophie. Commits for all 3 issues mentioned earlier have been
backported to the `2.6` branch.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 2:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sop...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Thanks Randall. I think all three of those seem important and should be
> merged back to the 2.6 branch.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:01 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Sophie.
> >
> > I have three new blockers related to a previous fix applied since 2.6.1
> > that I'd like to merge to the 2.6 branch:
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12340 -- potential
> resource
> > leak for Kafka*BackingStores used in Connect; PR is already approved and
> in
> > trunk
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12339 -- may cause Connect
> > worker to fail upon creation of internal topic (race condition); PR will
> > likely be approved shortly
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12343 -- Connect fails to
> > read internal topics on AK 0.10.x; PR will likely be approved shortly
> >
> > Please let me know if it's okay to merge these to the 2.6 branch for
> > inclusion in 2.6.2. Thanks!
> >
> > Randall
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:35 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This fix is merged and backported. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Randall
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Sophie:
> > >>
> > >> David J. has found a regression in MirrorMaker 2 that prevents the MM2
> > >> executable from starting:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12326. This was caused
> by a
> > >> recent fix of mine (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10021
> )
> > >> and is a serious regression limited to the MirrorMaker 2 executable. I
> > have
> > >> a one-line PR to fix the regression (
> > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10122) and have verified it
> > >> corrects the MM2 executable. Once the PR is approved and with your
> > >> approval, I can cherry-pick to the `2.6` branch.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>
> > >> Randall
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:43 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > sop...@confluent.io>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ok, thanks for the update!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:06 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi Ismael & Sophie,
> > >>> > Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a
> defect.
> > To
> > >>> > work with the project with a specific scala version, user might
> need
> > >>> to use
> > >>> > the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on
> > other
> > >>> > projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref:
> > >>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956
> > >>> > .
> > >>> >
> > >>> > So, you can continue to cut the rc.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thank you very much.
> > >>> > Luke
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
> > >>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I
> brought
> > >>> it to
> > >>> > > your attention.
> > >>> > > Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we
> > don't
> > >>> > need
> > >>> > > to cherry-pick the fix.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Thanks.
> > >>> > > Luke
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke
> > >>> needs to
> > >>> > be
> > >>> > >> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases
> > >>> where
> > >>> > >> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Ismael
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > >>> sop...@confluent.io>
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the
> > >>> commit
> > >>> > >> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But
> admittedly I
> > >>> don't
> > >>> > >> have
> > >>> > >> > much context on this particular issue
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against
> > >>> including
> > >>> > >> it.
> > >>> > >> > However
> > >>> > >> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't
> been
> > >>> > >> > cherrypicked by then
> > >>> > >> > I won't block the release on it.
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > > Hi Ismael,
> > >>> > >> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't
> > >>> insist on
> > >>> > >> > putting
> > >>> > >> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> > >>> > >> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the
> scala
> > >>> > 2.13.4
> > >>> > >> or
> > >>> > >> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
> > >>> > >> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the
> > fix
> > >>> > into
> > >>> > >> 2.6
> > >>> > >> > > and 2.7.
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > What do you think?
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > Thank you.
> > >>> > >> > > Luke
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <
> > ism...@juma.me.uk>
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like
> an
> > >>> > >> > improvement
> > >>> > >> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > Ismael
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <
> show...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > Hi Sophie,
> > >>> > >> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked
> into
> > >>> 2.6
> > >>> > and
> > >>> > >> > 2.7
> > >>> > >> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> > >>> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> > >>> > >> > > > >.
> > >>> > >> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of
> > >>> 2020, and
> > >>> > >> we
> > >>> > >> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this
> PR
> > >>> > >> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more
> > >>> specifically,
> > >>> > >> it's
> > >>> > >> > > > here
> > >>> > >> > > > > <
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > .
> > >>> > >> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on
> 2.8),
> > >>> but we
> > >>> > >> > didn't
> > >>> > >> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible
> > >>> issues) not
> > >>> > >> to
> > >>> > >> > > adopt
> > >>> > >> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into
> 2.6
> > >>> and
> > >>> > 2.7
> > >>> > >> > > > > branches. What do you think?
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > Thank you.
> > >>> > >> > > > > Luke
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > >>> > >> > > sop...@confluent.io>
> > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Hey all,
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their
> > way
> > >>> > over
> > >>> > >> to
> > >>> > >> > > the
> > >>> > >> > > > > 2.6
> > >>> > >> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an
> RC.
> > As
> > >>> > >> always,
> > >>> > >> > > > please
> > >>> > >> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker
> bugs
> > >>> that
> > >>> > >> affect
> > >>> > >> > > 2.6
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Sophie
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
> > >>> > >> vvcep...@apache.org>
> > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > I'm +1
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -John
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck
> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Bill
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
> > >>> > >> ism...@juma.me.uk
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > Ismael
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie
> > Blee-Goldman
> > >>> <
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > sop...@confluent.io>
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a
> > >>> 2.6.2
> > >>> > >> > release.
> > >>> > >> > > > > This
> > >>> > >> > > > > > is
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > being
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka
> > Streams
> > >>> for
> > >>> > >> > Windows
> > >>> > >> > > > > > users.
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to