Hi Sophie,

Thanks for the KIP, it makes sense to me.  I'm a +1 on the proposal.
I'm also a +1 to Ismael's suggestion for stating the removal of the
deprecated configs in 4.0

-Bill

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 3:02 PM John Roesler <vvcep...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello again, Sophie,
>
> I've just had a late-breaking thought about your KIP. It
> might be worthwhile also printing a WARN log when the
> deprecated configs are used. People may not always be
> referencing the StreamsConfig fields in their source code
> when they set these configs, so it would be good to make an
> extra effort to raise the visibility of this deprecation.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 10:47 -0700, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > Thanks Sophie for writing the KIP! I'm +1 on the proposal.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:56 AM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Sophie. This makes sense to me. One question: do we want to be
> a bit
> > > clearer about the removal plans? That is, can we say that the
> deprecated
> > > configs will be removed in 4.0 (instead of likely to be removed)? The
> > > implication would be that exactly-once would only work with 2.5+ while
> at
> > > least once would work with all versions. 4.0 is probably 1.5-2 years
> away,
> > > so this seems reasonable to me.
> > >
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 7:53 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman
> > > <sop...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to kick off discussion on a small KIP to move towards a
> unified
> > > > EOS and clean up the current options. Please give it a pass and let
> me
> > > know
> > > > what you think.
> > > >
> > > > KIP-732: Deprecate eos-alpha and replace eos-beta with eos-v2
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-732%3A+Deprecate+eos-alpha+and+replace+eos-beta+with+eos-v2
> > > > >
> > > > KAFKA-12574: Deprecate eos-alpha
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12574>
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sophie
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to