Hi Sanjana, Again I'm sorry for the delay. I've opened a draft PR which hopefully will let you make progress on KIP-709. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:10 PM Sanjana Kaundinya <skaundi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Mickael, > > Apologies for pinging on this again, but just wondering if you got a chance > to make any progress on this? Would love to take a look and help with the > reviews if you have. > > Thanks, > Sanjana > On May 7, 2021, 3:33 AM -0700, Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>, > wrote: > > Hi Sanjana, > > > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I hope to have a draft PR next week. > > > > Thanks > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:11 PM Sanjana Kaundinya <skaundi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Mickael, > > > > > > Just wanted to ping the thread to inquire if you’ve made any progress on > > > the implementation. I was planning on doing the implementation for > > > KIP-709 and seeing how KIP-699 is something that’s tightly coupled and > > > related to KIP-709 I thought I’d ask what the status of this KIP was. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sanjana > > > On Apr 13, 2021, 8:44 AM -0700, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>, > > > wrote: > > > > Thanks Mickael! > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Mickael Maison > > > > <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Rajini! > > > > > Yes it would be good to get it into 3.0. I've got some of it > > > > > implemented already, I'll try to get a PR out in the next couple of > > > > > weeks. > > > > > > > > > > I'm closing this vote. This KIP has been accepted with 3 +1 binding > > > > > votes from David, Tom and Rajini. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:49 PM Rajini Sivaram > > > > > <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mickael, > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP!. Looks like this KIP has sufficient votes. It > > > > > > will be > > > > > > good to get this into 3.0 along with KIP-709. Will you have time to > > > > > > work > > > > > on > > > > > > this? Please let us know if we can help with the implementation or > > > > > reviews. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:00 PM Tom Bentley <tbent...@redhat.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mickael, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to re-cast my vote as +1 (binding) now I'm a committer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:46 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Mickael. +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:53 AM Tom Bentley > > > > > > > > <tbent...@redhat.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks Mickael. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:32 PM Mickael Maison < > > > > > mimai...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-699 to support resolving > > > > > > > > > > multiple > > > > > > > > > > coordinators at a time: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-699%3A+Update+FindCoordinator+to+resolve+multiple+Coordinators+at+a+time > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
