Hi,

Quick update:
To handle reverting to the old behaviour with older brokers, I've
introduced a new exception, NoBatchedFindCoordinatorsException.
I've updated the KIP accordingly. For more details, see the discussion
in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10743

Thanks

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:18 PM Sanjana Kaundinya <skaundi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mickael,
> Just took a look at your draft PR, seems like your implementation is looking 
> to change the way we call all consumer group APIs to leverage the new 
> AdminApiHandler introduced by Jason as part of KIP-664. It also seems like 
> someone already got started to rewrite the ListOffsets API using this new 
> infrastructure with this PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10467/files 
> :). In any case this is very helpful and certainly changes my plans on how I 
> intended to implement the KIP. I can volunteer to help review your PR once 
> you’re done with it, since it will give me a good idea for my PR. I was also 
> hoping to get KIP-709 into 3.0 before the code freeze, but given that we are 
> now rewriting ListOffsets API, I think I’d better wait until you get your KIP 
> in. Are you planning on getting KIP-699 into 3.0?
> Cheers,
> Sanjana
> On May 23, 2021, 11:35 PM -0700, Sanjana Kaundinya <skaundi...@gmail.com>, 
> wrote:
> > Hi Mickael,
> > Thank you for your response! Will take a look at the draft PR later this 
> > week.
> > Cheers,
> > Sanjana
> > On May 21, 2021, 10:26 AM -0700, Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>, 
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Sanjana,
> > >
> > > Again I'm sorry for the delay.
> > > I've opened a draft PR which hopefully will let you make progress on
> > > KIP-709. Let me know if you have any questions.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:10 PM Sanjana Kaundinya <skaundi...@gmail.com> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mickael,
> > > >
> > > > Apologies for pinging on this again, but just wondering if you got a 
> > > > chance to make any progress on this? Would love to take a look and help 
> > > > with the reviews if you have.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sanjana
> > > > On May 7, 2021, 3:33 AM -0700, Mickael Maison 
> > > > <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > > > > Hi Sanjana,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the late reply.
> > > > > I hope to have a draft PR next week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:11 PM Sanjana Kaundinya 
> > > > > <skaundi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Mickael,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just wanted to ping the thread to inquire if you’ve made any 
> > > > > > progress on the implementation. I was planning on doing the 
> > > > > > implementation for KIP-709 and seeing how KIP-699 is something 
> > > > > > that’s tightly coupled and related to KIP-709 I thought I’d ask 
> > > > > > what the status of this KIP was.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sanjana
> > > > > > On Apr 13, 2021, 8:44 AM -0700, Rajini Sivaram 
> > > > > > <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > > > > > > Thanks Mickael!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rajini
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Mickael Maison 
> > > > > > > <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Rajini!
> > > > > > > > Yes it would be good to get it into 3.0. I've got some of it
> > > > > > > > implemented already, I'll try to get a PR out in the next 
> > > > > > > > couple of
> > > > > > > > weeks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm closing this vote. This KIP has been accepted with 3 +1 
> > > > > > > > binding
> > > > > > > > votes from David, Tom and Rajini.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:49 PM Rajini Sivaram 
> > > > > > > > <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Mickael,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP!. Looks like this KIP has sufficient 
> > > > > > > > > votes. It will be
> > > > > > > > > good to get this into 3.0 along with KIP-709. Will you have 
> > > > > > > > > time to work
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > this? Please let us know if we can help with the 
> > > > > > > > > implementation or
> > > > > > > > reviews.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rajini
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 4:00 PM Tom Bentley 
> > > > > > > > > <tbent...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Mickael,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to re-cast my vote as +1 (binding) now I'm a 
> > > > > > > > > > committer.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks again,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Tom
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:46 AM David Jacot 
> > > > > > > > > > <dja...@confluent.io>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Mickael. +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:53 AM Tom Bentley 
> > > > > > > > > > > <tbent...@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding), thanks Mickael.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:32 PM Mickael Maison <
> > > > > > > > mimai...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-699 to support 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > resolving multiple
> > > > > > > > > > > > > coordinators at a time:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-699%3A+Update+FindCoordinator+to+resolve+multiple+Coordinators+at+a+time
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >

Reply via email to