Hi all,

Just a quick reminder that KIP Freeze is next Wednesday, June 9th.
A vote thread needs to be open for at least 72 hours, so to everyone that
is working hard on proposals targeting 3.0.0, please make sure that your
[VOTE] threads are started on time.

Best,
Konstantine


On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 8:10 PM Israel Ekpo <israele...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on the new schedule.
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 8:14 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman
> <sop...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Ah ok, thanks Konstantine. I won't bug you about every new KIP that comes
> > in between now and KIP Freeze :P
> >
> > +1 on the scheduling changes as well
> >
> > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 4:00 PM David Arthur <mum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The new schedule looks good to me, +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 6:29 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Konstantine, +1 from me.
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 2:48 PM Konstantine Karantasis
> > > > <konstant...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please find below the updated release plan for the Apache Kafka
> 3.0.0
> > > > > release.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=177046466
> > > > >
> > > > > New suggested dates for the release are as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > KIP Freeze is 09 June 2021 (same date as in the initial plan)
> > > > > Feature Freeze is 30 June 2021 (new date, extended by two weeks)
> > > > > Code Freeze is 14 July 2021 (new date, extended by two weeks)
> > > > >
> > > > > At least two weeks of stabilization will follow Code Freeze.
> > > > >
> > > > > The release plan is up to date and currently includes all the
> > approved
> > > > KIPs
> > > > > that are targeting 3.0.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any objections with the recent
> > extension
> > > > of
> > > > > Feature Freeze and Code Freeze or any other concerns.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Konstantine
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > > David Arthur
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to