I have started a new thread to vote for the RC1. Therefore, this vote
is close.

Thanks,
David

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:14 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io> wrote:

> Hi Randall,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> I definitely missed updating
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/2.8.1-rc0/docs/js/templateData.js. I
> will fix this. I will cut a new RC to address this.
>
> Regarding https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/tree/asf-site/28, I did
> not update the documentation
> there yet. The issue is that it would update the current live
> documentation (2.8) with references to an
> unreleased version. We can't really do this, right? I could publish the
> doc in a temporary directory
> (e.g. 281) for the time being. What do you think?
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 12:19 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, David.
>>
>> I was able to successfully complete the following:
>>
>> - Build release archive from the tag, installed locally, and ran a portion
>> of quickstart
>> - Installed 2.8.1 RC0 and performed quickstart for broker and Connect
>> - Verified signatures and checksums
>> - Verified the tag
>> - Compared the release notes to JIRA
>> - Manually spotchecked the Javadocs
>>
>> However, generated docs at
>> https://kafka.apache.org/28/documentation.html incorrectly
>> reference the 2.8.0 version in the following sections:
>>
>> * https://kafka.apache.org/28/documentation.html#quickstart
>> * https://kafka.apache.org/28/documentation.html#producerapi
>> * https://kafka.apache.org/28/documentation.html#consumerapi
>> * https://kafka.apache.org/28/documentation.html#streamsapi
>> * https://kafka.apache.org/28/documentation.html#adminapi
>>
>> The way these are updated during the release process has changed recently.
>> IIUC they are generated as part of the release build via the
>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/2.8.1-rc0/docs/js/templateData.js
>> file, which appears to have not been updated in the tag:
>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/2.8.1-rc0/docs/js/templateData.js#L22
>> .
>> Maybe
>> the https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Process
>> needs
>> to be tweaked to update this file even when cutting a patch release RC (it
>> currently says to update this file in the section for major and minor
>> releases).
>>
>> Also, the https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/tree/asf-site/28 history
>> shows no updates since July. I guess that's possible, but might be worth
>> double checking.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Randall
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:15 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>> >
>> > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.8.1.
>> >
>> > Apache Kafka 2.8.1 is a bugfix release and fixes 49 issues since the
>> 2.8.0
>> > release. Please see the release notes for more information.
>> >
>> > Release notes for the 2.8.1 release:
>> > https://home.apache.org/~dajac/kafka-2.8.1-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>> >
>> > *** Please download, test and vote by Friday, September 17, 9am PT
>> >
>> > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> > https://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>> >
>> > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
>> > https://home.apache.org/~dajac/kafka-2.8.1-rc0/
>> >
>> > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/kafka/
>> >
>> > * Javadoc:
>> > https://home.apache.org/~dajac/kafka-2.8.1-rc0/javadoc/
>> >
>> > * Tag to be voted upon (off 2.8 branch) is the 2.8.1 tag:
>> > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/2.8.1-rc0
>> >
>> > * Documentation:
>> > https://kafka.apache.org/28/documentation.html
>> >
>> > * Protocol:
>> > https://kafka.apache.org/28/protocol.html
>> >
>> > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 2.8 branch:
>> > Unit/integration tests:
>> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/2.8/80/
>> > System tests:
>> > https://jenkins.confluent.io/job/system-test-kafka/job/2.8/214/
>> >
>> > /**************************************
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > David
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to