+1 Thanks for all the hard work.

-Jason

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:17 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The vote has been open for a while. I plan to close it on Friday if
> there are no further comments in the discussion thread.
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:10 PM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, David,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:21 AM Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Great work on the KIP, David.
> > >
> > > +1 (nonbinding)
> > >
> > > Den fre 14 okt. 2022 kl 11:50 skrev Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi David,
> > > >
> > > > I made a final pass and LGTM now.
> > > > +1 from me.
> > > >
> > > > Luke
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 12:32 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello David,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've made my final pass on the doc and I think it looks good now.
> +1.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Guozhang
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 1:37 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks David,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are a few minor comments pending in the discussion thread,
> and
> > > > one
> > > > > > is about whether we should merge PreparePartitionAssignment with
> HB.
> > > > But
> > > > > I
> > > > > > think the KIP itself is in pretty good shape now. Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Guozhang
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 1:32 AM David Jacot
> > > <dja...@confluent.io.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thank you all for the very positive discussion about KIP-848. It
> > > looks
> > > > > >> like folks are very positive about it overall.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I would like to start a vote on KIP-848, which introduces a
> brand
> > > new
> > > > > >> consumer rebalance protocol.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The KIP is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/HhD1D.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > >> David
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > -- Guozhang
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > -- Guozhang
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to