Hi all, I am pleased to announce that the KIP is accepted with 4 binding votes from Guozhang, Luke, Jun and Jason, and 1 non-binding vote from Magnus.
Thank you all for the great discussion and feedback! Best, David On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 6:33 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > +1 Thanks for all the hard work. > > -Jason > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:17 AM David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.invalid> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The vote has been open for a while. I plan to close it on Friday if > > there are no further comments in the discussion thread. > > > > Best, > > David > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:10 PM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, David, > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 > > > > > > Jun > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 2:21 AM Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Great work on the KIP, David. > > > > > > > > +1 (nonbinding) > > > > > > > > Den fre 14 okt. 2022 kl 11:50 skrev Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > > > > > I made a final pass and LGTM now. > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > > > > > Luke > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 12:32 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello David, > > > > > > > > > > > > I've made my final pass on the doc and I think it looks good now. > > +1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 1:37 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks David, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are a few minor comments pending in the discussion thread, > > and > > > > > one > > > > > > > is about whether we should merge PreparePartitionAssignment with > > HB. > > > > > But > > > > > > I > > > > > > > think the KIP itself is in pretty good shape now. Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 1:32 AM David Jacot > > > > <dja...@confluent.io.invalid > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi all, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Thank you all for the very positive discussion about KIP-848. It > > > > looks > > > > > > >> like folks are very positive about it overall. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I would like to start a vote on KIP-848, which introduces a > > brand > > > > new > > > > > > >> consumer rebalance protocol. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> The KIP is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/HhD1D. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Best, > > > > > > >> David > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
