Hi all,

With binding +1s from Ron, David, Divij, ziming, and Luke, the vote passes. 
Thanks, everyone.

Best,
Colin

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, at 16:02, Colin McCabe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, at 07:09, Ron Dagostino wrote:
>> Thanks, Colin.  +1 (binding) from me.
>>
>> I will note that Ziming mentioned in the DISCUSS thread that "There is
>> a mistake that we use `--bootstrap-server` instead of
>> `--bootstrap-server(s)`, so should we also change the new argument
>> `--bootstrap-controller` (no s).".  I agree that this is an
>> unfortunate historical artifact.  Furthermore, the config property is
>> bootstrap.servers, which does not match the command line argument
>> --bootstrap-server.  I don't know what we should do here -- I am not
>> sure that we should propagate it.  We could continue the same mismatch
>> and use --bootstrap-controller, but I feel like using
>> --bootstrap-controllers makes more sense.  Anyway, this is more an
>> ergonomic issue than anything else.  I am still +1 binding, but we
>> should arrive at an explicit decision here.
>
> Hi Ron,
>
> Thanks for the review and vote.
>
> The current KIP-919 text has "--bootstrap-controllers" for command-line 
> and "bootstrap.controllers" for config.
>
> As far as I know, --bootstrap-server is singular rather than plural 
> just for historical reasons.... so I figured the new flag can just be 
> plural. As you mentioned, the configs have always been plural, so it's 
> more consistent for the flags to match the configs.
>
> (Though obviously that ship has sailed on --bootstrap-server, we're not 
> gonna change it now ;)
>
>>
>> Nits:
>> s/boostrap-servers/bootstrap-servers/
>> s/DescribeClusterResquest/DescribeClusterRequest/
>> s/ControllerRegistrationRecord/RegisterControllerRecord/g
>>
>
> Thanks. I fixed these typos and changed ControllerRegistrationRecord -> 
> RegisterControllerRecord as suggested.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
>> Ron
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:06 AM David Arthur
>> <david.art...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for driving this KIP, Colin!
>>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 8:58 AM Divij Vaidya <divijvaidy...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1 (binding)
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Divij Vaidya
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:56 PM ziming deng <dengziming1...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > +1 (binding) from me.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks for the KIP!
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Ziming
>>> > >
>>> > > > On Jul 26, 2023, at 20:18, Luke Chen <show...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > +1 (binding) from me.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks for the KIP!
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Luke
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 1:24 AM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> Hi all,
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> I'd like to start the vote for KIP-919: Allow AdminClient to Talk
>>> > Directly
>>> > > >> with the KRaft Controller Quorum and add Controller Registration.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> The KIP is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Owo0Dw
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> Thanks to everyone who reviewed the proposal.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> best,
>>> > > >> Colin
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -David

Reply via email to