bump this discuss thread.

best,
hudeqi

"hudeqi" <16120...@bjtu.edu.cn>写道:
> Sorry for not getting email reminders and ignoring your reply for getting 
> back so late, Yash Mayya, Greg Harris, Sagar.
> 
> Thank you for your thoughts and suggestions, I learned a lot, I will give my 
> thoughts and answers in a comprehensive way:
> 1. The default configuration of 50MB is the online configuration I actually 
> used to solve this problem, and the effect is better (see the description of 
> jira:https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/issues/KAFKA-15086?filter=allopenissues.
>  In fact, I think it may be better to set this value smaller, so I abandoned 
> the default value like __consumer_offsets, but I don't know how much the 
> default value is the best.). Secondly, I also set the default value of 50MB 
> online through ConfigDef#defineInternal, and if the value configured by the 
> user is greater than the default value, the warning log will be displayed, 
> but the only difference from your said is that I will overwrite the value 
> configured by the user with the default value (emmm, this point was denied by 
> Chris Egerton: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13852, in fact, you all 
> agree that should not directly override the user-configured value, and now I 
> agree with this). 
> 2. I think the potential bug that Greg mentioned may lead to inconsistent 
> state between workers is a great point. It is true that we cannot directly 
> change the configuration for an existing internal topics. Perhaps a more 
> tricky and disgusting approach is that we manually find that the active 
> segment sizes of all current partitions are relatively small, first stop all 
> connect instances, then change the topic configuration, and finally start the 
> instances.
> 
> To sum up, I think whether the scope of the KIP could be reduced to: only set 
> the default value of the 'segment.bytes' of the internal topics and make a 
> warning for the bigger value configured by the user. What do you think? If 
> there's a better way I'm all ears.
> 
> best,
> hudeqi

Reply via email to