Hi Ismael, That would be totally different from the pattern currently being followed in all the interfaces, for example serializer. I personally don't favour that either. Let's see if the community has any opinions on the same.
Hey everyone, please share your thoughts on using a DTO instead of separate params for the interface. Thanks. On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 8:06 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > I mean a DTO. That means you can add additional parameters later without > breaking compatibility. The current proposal would result in yet another > method each time we need to add parameters. > > Ismael > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 4:53 AM Jack Tomy <jacktomy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey Ismael, > > > > Are you suggesting to pass a param like a DTO or you are suggesting to > pass > > the record object? > > > > I would also like to hear other devs' opinions on this as I personally > > favour what is done currently. > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 9:34 AM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. The problem outlined here is a great example why we > > > should be using a record-like structure to pass the parameters to a > > method > > > like this. Then we can add more parameters without having to introduce > > new > > > methods. Have we considered this option? > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 5:26 AM Jack Tomy <jacktomy...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey everyone. > > > > > > > > I would like to call for a vote on KIP-953: partition method to be > > > > overloaded to accept headers as well. > > > > > > > > KIP : > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=263424937 > > > > Discussion thread : > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0f20kvfqkmhdqrwcb8vqgqn80szcrcdd > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards > > > > *Jack* > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > *Jack* > > > -- Best Regards *Jack*
