Hi Ivan, This is a reasonable request. I think it is good to address now because of the confusion the API is creating. Abhijeet agreed to volunteer to raise PR today to address KAFKA-14993.
Thanks, Satish. On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 14:54, Ivan Yurchenko <i...@ivanyu.me> wrote: > > Hi Satish and all, > > I wonder if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14993 should be > included in the 3.6 release plan. I'm thinking that when implemented, it > would be a small, but still a change in the RSM contract: throw an exception > instead of returning an empty InputStream. Maybe it should be included right > away to save the migration later? What do you think? > > Best, > Ivan > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, at 02:52, Satish Duggana wrote: > > Hi Jose, > > Thanks for looking into this issue and resolving it with a quick fix. > > > > ~Satish. > > > > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 21:40, José Armando García Sancio > > <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Satish, > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 4:58 PM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > It seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14273 has been > > > > there in 3.5.x too. > > > > > > I also agree that it should be a blocker for 3.6.0. It should have > > > been a blocker for those previous releases. I didn't fix it because, > > > unfortunately, I wasn't aware of the issue and jira. > > > I'll create a PR with a fix in case the original author doesn't respond > > > in time. > > > > > > Satish, do you agree? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > -- > > > -José > >
