Quick update on my two blockers: KAFKA-15435 is merged to trunk and
cherry-picked to 3.6. I have a PR open for KAFKA-15441 and will hopefully
get it merged today.

-David

On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 5:26 AM Ivan Yurchenko <i...@ivanyu.me> wrote:

> Hi Satish and all,
>
> I wonder if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14993 should be
> included in the 3.6 release plan. I'm thinking that when implemented, it
> would be a small, but still a change in the RSM contract: throw an
> exception instead of returning an empty InputStream. Maybe it should be
> included right away to save the migration later? What do you think?
>
> Best,
> Ivan
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2023, at 02:52, Satish Duggana wrote:
> > Hi Jose,
> > Thanks for looking into this issue and resolving it with a quick fix.
> >
> > ~Satish.
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 21:40, José Armando García Sancio
> > <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Satish,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 4:58 PM Satish Duggana <
> satish.dugg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > It seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14273 has been
> > > > there in 3.5.x too.
> > >
> > > I also agree that it should be a blocker for 3.6.0. It should have
> > > been a blocker for those previous releases. I didn't fix it because,
> > > unfortunately, I wasn't aware of the issue and jira.
> > > I'll create a PR with a fix in case the original author doesn't
> respond in time.
> > >
> > > Satish, do you agree?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > --
> > > -José
> >
>


-- 
-David

Reply via email to