Hi Mario and Nelson, Thanks for asking. Both of these KIPs can certainly go in 3.9 if we can hit the deadlines. If you need an extra day or two just ping me. (But I don't want to extend things for too long!) :)
Do we feel that KIP-1040 can make feature freeze? best, Colin On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, at 01:48, Mario Fiore Vitale wrote: > Hi all, > > Can the KIP-1040[1] be included? It is accepted and a PR review is in > progress. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1040%3A+Improve+handling+of+nullable+values+in+InsertField%2C+ExtractField%2C+and+other+transformations > > Thanks, > Mario. > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 8:28 AM Nelson B. <bachmanity...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Can I include KIP-1025 >> < >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1025%3A+Optionally+URL-encode+clientID+and+clientSecret+in+authorization+header >> > >> in >> this release? >> It's currently in the voting stage, I hope it can receive enough votes by >> next week. >> >> Thanks. >> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 5:32 AM José Armando García Sancio >> <jsan...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: >> >> > Would it be better to start a DISCUSS thread for 4.0 and keep this >> > thread for 3.9 discussions? We seem to have agreement on 3.9. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:29 PM José Armando García Sancio >> > <jsan...@confluent.io> wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 for me. Thanks Colin for volunteering to be the release manager. >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 4:15 PM Ismael Juma <m...@ismaeljuma.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > >> > > > I think we should actually look at the target dates vs just looking >> at >> > the >> > > > release length. 3.9 is an August release. I suggest we aim for a >> > November >> > > > release for 4.0, which is 3 months (instead of 4). Why? Because >> > December is >> > > > a tricky month given holidays and all. And it gives us a buffer for >> > release >> > > > delays that still allows for a 4.0 in 2024. >> > > > >> > > > Ismael >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:54 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > In general I prefer to stick with the original time frame, but I >> > believe >> > > > > an additional month would be good for KIP-848. >> > > > > >> > > > > Maybe we can cut down 2 weeks for the 4.1 and 4.2 releases each, to >> > make >> > > > > up for the time? Not a must; just an idea. We can also just accept >> a >> > > > > one-time shift of the release time plan -- we did not really lose >> the >> > > > > time effectively, as there was one additional release. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -Matthias >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 6/17/24 12:14 PM, David Jacot wrote: >> > > > > > +1 for the release plan. Thanks! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 for releasing 4.0 four months after 3.9. 4.0 is actually a >> > pretty big >> > > > > > release as we will GA KIP-848, including new group coordinator >> and >> > new >> > > > > > consumer rebalance protocol. This is a pretty big change :). >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Best, >> > > > > > David >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Le lun. 17 juin 2024 à 20:36, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> >> a >> > écrit >> > > > > : >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi all, >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Thanks, everyone. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Quick update: on the release plan page, I moved feature freeze >> > forward >> > > > > and >> > > > > >> code freeze by one week to make sure we can hit that. No other >> > dates >> > > > > >> changed. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> With regard to 4.0, I was assuming that we'd do it 4 months >> after >> > 3.9 >> > > > > was >> > > > > >> released. I think for that release, we should front-load all the >> > "remove >> > > > > >> deprecated stuff" work that has piled up, and try to really hit >> > all the >> > > > > >> release milestone dates. I don't think 4.0 needs to be a very >> > ambitious >> > > > > >> release, it really is mostly about the removals and the new JDK >> > (which >> > > > > are >> > > > > >> a big deal, but I hope should fit within the normal timeframes). >> > That >> > > > > being >> > > > > >> said, if people want a shorter 4.0, I'm open to that, as long as >> > we're >> > > > > >> confident we could actually do that :) >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> best, >> > > > > >> Colin >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, at 20:56, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: >> > > > > >>> +1, thank you Colin >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> Given the July freeze deadlines, I take it we are going with >> the >> > "short >> > > > > >>> 3.9.0 release" option and that the existence of this release >> will >> > > > > impact >> > > > > >>> the 4.0.0 deadlines which will still follow the usual schedule >> > -- in >> > > > > >> other >> > > > > >>> words, this is an "additional release" outside of the regular >> > timeline. >> > > > > >> Is >> > > > > >>> this understanding correct? >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:57 PM Chia-Ping Tsai < >> > chia7...@gmail.com> >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>>> +1 thanks Colin! >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > -José >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > -José >> > >> > > > -- > > Mario Fiore Vitale > > Senior Software Engineer > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> > <https://www.redhat.com/>
