Thanks Chris. That's fair.
-Matthias
On 7/15/24 4:03 PM, Chris Egerton wrote:
+0
Alieh, Matthias, Andrew--I know this isn't what you were hoping for, and I
want to acknowledge the significant time and effort you've put into this
KIP. I do believe it solves a real problem for Kafka Streams, but I don't
believe the solution as presented is worth the fine print and potential
footguns that it would come with for other users of the producer API. I
also believe that the way that the design is predicated on producer
internals makes these issues virtually impossible to overcome. If an
internal configuration property is an option, I think that would be a
reasonable compromise. And if not, I still don't dislike this strongly
enough to actively try to block it with a -1 vote; if there are other
committers who disagree with my assessment and believe that this design
makes the right tradeoffs, then I believe this KIP deserves to pass.
I'll continue to monitor the discussion thread in case there's an
opportunity to change my mind.
Best,
Chris
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 6:32 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
Thanks for the KIP Alieh!
+1 (binding)
-Matthias
On 6/26/24 5:29 AM, Andrew Schofield wrote:
Hi Alieh,
Thanks for the KIP. I think we’ve settled on a good solution.
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Andrew
On 25 Jun 2024, at 13:17, Alieh Saeedi <asae...@confluent.io.INVALID>
wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to open voting for KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush()
method to clear the latest send() error
<
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1059%3A+Enable+the+Producer+flush%28%29+method+to+clear+the+latest+send%28%29+error
.
Cheers,
Alieh
