hi Lan chia_04:
The default value of maximum message size is `1024 * 1024 + Records.LOG_OVERHEAD`. Should the new configurations be aligned with it? Best, Chia-Ping Lan Ding <[email protected]> 於 2025年8月22日 週五 上午9:12寫道： > Hi Sean, > > You're absolutely right. Thanks for summarizing it so clearly! > > That's also the reason I renamed the config ----the original > > name could indeed be misleading. > > Best, > > Lan > > At 2025-08-22 01:42:09, "Sean Quah" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi Lan, > >Thanks for your response. I misunderstood the purpose of the proposed > >`max.buffer.size` configs earlier. I thought we were going to reject > >messages larger than the `max.buffer.size`, but that's not the case. The > >new configs only control the buffer caching behavior and we will continue > >to allow writes up to `max.message.bytes`. ie. we can temporarily have a > >buffer larger than `max.buffer.size` but it won't be held for reuse. > Please > >correct me if my understanding is still wrong. > > > >Thanks, > >Sean > > > >On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 5:38 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> hi Lan > >> > >> chia_03: > >> > >> Since the hard limit between `message.max.bytes` and this new config was > >> removed, is it still necessary to make `max.buffer.size` dynamic? Users > >> won’t encounter errors when decreasing `message.max.bytes` anymore. > >> > >> Best, > >> Chia-Ping > >> > >> On 2025/08/17 16:37:40 Lan Ding wrote: > >> > Hello everyone, I'd like to discuss a KIP regarding introducing a new > >> configuration, > >> > group.coordinator.append.max.bytes Thank you! KIP link: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/hA5JFg Best, Lan Ding > >> >
