Hi Chia-Ping,
Thanks for the suggestions.
chia_04: Updated the default value of "max.buffer.size".
Best,
Lan
At 2025-08-25 04:34:27, "Chia-Ping Tsai" <[email protected]> wrote:
>hi Lan
>
>chia_04:
>
>The default value of maximum message size is `1024 * 1024 +
>Records.LOG_OVERHEAD`. Should the new configurations be aligned with it?
>
>Best,
>Chia-Ping
>
>
>Lan Ding <[email protected]> 於 2025年8月22日 週五 上午9:12寫道：
>
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> You're absolutely right. Thanks for summarizing it so clearly!
>>
>> That's also the reason I renamed the config ----the original
>>
>> name could indeed be misleading.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Lan
>>
>> At 2025-08-22 01:42:09, "Sean Quah" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >Hi Lan,
>> >Thanks for your response. I misunderstood the purpose of the proposed
>> >`max.buffer.size` configs earlier. I thought we were going to reject
>> >messages larger than the `max.buffer.size`, but that's not the case. The
>> >new configs only control the buffer caching behavior and we will continue
>> >to allow writes up to `max.message.bytes`. ie. we can temporarily have a
>> >buffer larger than `max.buffer.size` but it won't be held for reuse.
>> Please
>> >correct me if my understanding is still wrong.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Sean
>> >
>> >On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 5:38 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> hi Lan
>> >>
>> >> chia_03:
>> >>
>> >> Since the hard limit between `message.max.bytes` and this new config was
>> >> removed, is it still necessary to make `max.buffer.size` dynamic? Users
>> >> won’t encounter errors when decreasing `message.max.bytes` anymore.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Chia-Ping
>> >>
>> >> On 2025/08/17 16:37:40 Lan Ding wrote:
>> >> > Hello everyone, I'd like to discuss a KIP regarding introducing a new
>> >> configuration,
>> >> > group.coordinator.append.max.bytes Thank you! KIP link:
>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/hA5JFg Best, Lan Ding
>> >>
>>
