Hi Edoardo,

Thanks for the KIP! Nice find and fix!
Overall LGTM, just one minor comment:

I think we should explicitly mention the config will be removed in v4.0 in
the "Compatibility" section.

Thank you,
Luke

On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 3:49 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
>
> PoAn Yang <[email protected]> 於 2025年12月8日週一 下午2:30寫道:
>
> > Hi Edoardo,
> >
> > Thanks for the mini-KIP.
> >
> > It's good that we have a compromise solution that allows us to keep
> > the existing behavior while providing an opportunity to align the
> behavior.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > PoAn
> >
> > > On Dec 5, 2025, at 9:11 PM, Edoardo Comar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > as already discussed in the separate mailing list thread
> > > [DISCUSS] AlterConfigPolicy behavior in 3.9.2
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/bknho1vrvby1tpq634g744vqf4mr8coh
> > >
> > > I would like to propose this minikip
> > > KIP-1252: AlterConfigPolicy compatibility in legacy Zookeeper mode
> > > (3.9.2 release)
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=399279475
> > >
> > > that aims to combine a fix to an old inconsistency without breaking
> > > any backward compatibility.
> > >
> > > Adding new config in minor releases is an exception,
> > > as for ZK support the 3.9.x branch is the end of the line
> > >
> > > Objections are welcome
> > > but If no objections are raised, you might even cast a vote in this
> > thread :-)
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Edo
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to