I have pushed an implementation of the KIP in
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19263

If agreed, i will declare the mini-KIP as accepted as it had 3 binding votes

Thank you

On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 at 02:10, Luke Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Edoardo,
>
> Thanks for the update.
> Looks good to me.
>
> Luke
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 7:20 PM Edoardo Comar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > KIP amended with
> > `
> > The new configuration entry will not be ported to 4.x versions where
> > there is no ZkAdminManager component
> > `
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 11:33, Luke Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Edoardo.
> > > I'm +1 (binding) as long as we make it clear in the KIP.
> > >
> > >
> > > Luke
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:30 PM Edoardo Comar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Luke,
> > > > I can add that this is not ever to be ported to 4.x
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 06:54, Luke Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Edoardo,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the KIP! Nice find and fix!
> > > > > Overall LGTM, just one minor comment:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we should explicitly mention the config will be removed in
> > v4.0
> > > > in
> > > > > the "Compatibility" section.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > Luke
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 3:49 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PoAn Yang <[email protected]> 於 2025年12月8日週一 下午2:30寫道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Edoardo,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the mini-KIP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's good that we have a compromise solution that allows us to
> > keep
> > > > > > > the existing behavior while providing an opportunity to align the
> > > > > > behavior.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > > > PoAn
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Dec 5, 2025, at 9:11 PM, Edoardo Comar <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > as already discussed in the separate mailing list thread
> > > > > > > > [DISCUSS] AlterConfigPolicy behavior in 3.9.2
> > > > > > > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/bknho1vrvby1tpq634g744vqf4mr8coh
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would like to propose this minikip
> > > > > > > > KIP-1252: AlterConfigPolicy compatibility in legacy Zookeeper
> > mode
> > > > > > > > (3.9.2 release)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=399279475
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > that aims to combine a fix to an old inconsistency without
> > breaking
> > > > > > > > any backward compatibility.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Adding new config in minor releases is an exception,
> > > > > > > > as for ZK support the 3.9.x branch is the end of the line
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Objections are welcome
> > > > > > > > but If no objections are raised, you might even cast a vote in
> > this
> > > > > > > thread :-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > cheers,
> > > > > > > > Edo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to