Thanks for the votes, KIP-1291 is Accepted.

3 (+1 binding) : Chia-Ping, Omnia and PoAn
1 (+1 non binding) : Vaquar

Thanks,
Sahil

On Mon, May 4, 2026 at 1:39 PM PoAn Yang <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> PoAn
>
> > On May 4, 2026, at 11:41 AM, Sahil Devgon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, bumping the thread for vote. Thanks, Sahil
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 1:07 PM Sahil Devgon <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the vote! We have 2 (+1 binding : Chia-Ping and Omnia ) and 1
> >> (+1 non-binding: Vaquar) votes so far for the KIP.
> >>
> >> *Quick Summary:*
> >> The KIP proposes *exposing all 7 metrics from /proc/self/io* instead of
> >> the current 2 (*read_bytes and write_bytes*) with the *5 additional*
> >> metrics (*rchar, wchar, syscr, syscw, cancelled_write_bytes*) that would
> >> enable operators to diagnose *cache effectiveness, write amplification,
> >> and I/O pattern inefficiencies *directly from Kafka's JMX.
> >> The change is purely additive and backward compatible.
> >>
> >> KIP-1291 : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/co48G
> >> DISCUSS thread:
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/o6tlkz2r32f1c7db5b2mxzl335sodwng
> >> VOTE thread:
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/dllnl649lj2qsr2myqcm6s80vc4gkmzn
> >>
> >> I would request the rest of the community members to review and vote,
> and
> >> if there are still more suggestions and a need for discussion I am open
> to
> >> it.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Sahil Devgon
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 4:02 PM Omnia Ibrahim <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP
> >>>
> >>>> On 13 Mar 2026, at 11:32, Sahil Devgon <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to start a vote on the KIP-1291: Extended I/O Metrics
> >>>> Collection.
> >>>> KIP : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/co48G
> >>>> Discussion thread:
> >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/o6tlkz2r32f1c7db5b2mxzl335sodwng
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Sahil Devgon
> >>>
> >>>
>
>

Reply via email to