Hi everyone,
I am closing the vote for KIP-1276. The vote has passed.
+1 (binding): Mickael Maison, Andrew Schofield, Christo Lolov
+1 (non-binding): Federico Valeri
I will now update the KIP wiki page with the accepted status. Thank you all
for participating!
Cheers,
Maros
št 28. 5. 2026 o 13:03 Christo Lolov <[email protected]> napísal(a):

> +1 (binding) from me. Thank you for pushing for this!
>
> Best,
> Christo
>
> On Thu, 28 May 2026 at 08:50, Andrew Schofield <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> >
> > On 2026/05/28 06:23:55 Maroš Orsák wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Friendly bump on this vote thread. With the KIP freeze for 4.4
> approaching
> > > in early June, it would be great if you could take a moment to review
> and
> > > vote.
> > >
> > > To recap, this KIP adds subnet-level support (CIDR notation) to ACL
> host
> > > patterns, so administrators can write rules for entire IP ranges
> instead of
> > > maintaining individual entries per host.
> > >
> > > Related KIP:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1276
> > > Discussion:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4o5lcl2nbzt0sf28rzx90rnyyf50xfx2
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Maros
> > >
> > > ut 26. 5. 2026 o 16:24 Mickael Maison <[email protected]>
> napísal(a):
> > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > > Mickael
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 2:21 PM Federico Valeri <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 non binding
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Fede
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 10:58 AM Maroš Orsák <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start on the vote on KIP-1276 as it seems we
> converge
> > > > into
> > > > > > final result of KIP with changes applied:
> > > > > >
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1276%3A+CIDR-based+Host+Patterns+for+ACLs
> > > > > > .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Maros.
> > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to