Indeed. I’ve removed the dangling reference.
> On Oct 23, 2026, at 08:31, Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the update. I think there's an orphaned "ofStringUtf8" floating > around in there. > > Thanks, > Andrew > >> On 2026/10/23 15:17:53 Aditya Kousik via dev wrote: >> Thank you both. >> >> Mickael, thank you for the last minute catch. I’ve moved the abstract >> methods to rejected alternatives and added default methods to both >> Header/Headers. >> >> This also simplifies the KIP and removes the changes affecting >> RecordHeader(s). >> >> Please take a look at the updated version. >> >> Best, >> Aditya >> >>>> On Oct 22, 2026, at 08:31, Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andrew >>> >>>> On 2026/10/22 15:25:41 Mickael Maison wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the KIP >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Mickael >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 8:49 PM Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Greetings, >>>>> >>>>> Gentle ping on this KIP. With the proposal, we can swap >>>>> record.headers().add(“isRetryRecord”, new byte[] { 0x0 }); with >>>>> record.headers.add(“isRetryRecord”, false); similarly for other plain >>>>> datatypes. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Aditya >>>>> >>>>>> On May 26, 2026, at 22:23, Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for KIP-1308. >>>>>> >>>>>> KIP Design doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/FpY8G >>>>>> Discussion thread: >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/odpnx9ttbws0fjhfh07vspb5mklv2zq4 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks and regards, >>>>>> Aditya Kousik >>>> >>
