Hi Andrew and Mickael, Does the latest version of the KIP still look good?
Best Aditya On 2026/10/23 15:49:18 Aditya Kousik via dev wrote: > Indeed. I’ve removed the dangling reference. > > > On Oct 23, 2026, at 08:31, Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the update. I think there's an orphaned "ofStringUtf8" floating > > around in there. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > > >> On 2026/10/23 15:17:53 Aditya Kousik via dev wrote: > >> Thank you both. > >> > >> Mickael, thank you for the last minute catch. I’ve moved the abstract > >> methods to rejected alternatives and added default methods to both > >> Header/Headers. > >> > >> This also simplifies the KIP and removes the changes affecting > >> RecordHeader(s). > >> > >> Please take a look at the updated version. > >> > >> Best, > >> Aditya > >> > >>>> On Oct 22, 2026, at 08:31, Andrew Schofield <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Andrew > >>> > >>>> On 2026/10/22 15:25:41 Mickael Maison wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for the KIP > >>>> +1 (binding) > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Mickael > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 8:49 PM Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Greetings, > >>>>> > >>>>> Gentle ping on this KIP. With the proposal, we can swap > >>>>> record.headers().add(“isRetryRecord”, new byte[] { 0x0 }); with > >>>>> record.headers.add(“isRetryRecord”, false); similarly for other plain > >>>>> datatypes. > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Aditya > >>>>> > >>>>>> On May 26, 2026, at 22:23, Aditya Kousik <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for KIP-1308. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> KIP Design doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/FpY8G > >>>>>> Discussion thread: > >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/odpnx9ttbws0fjhfh07vspb5mklv2zq4 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks and regards, > >>>>>> Aditya Kousik > >>>> > >> >
