-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31366/#review74160
-----------------------------------------------------------



core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/AbstractFetcherThread.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31366/#comment120683>

    Using the foreach method on partitionMap.get(topicAndPartition) would 
accomplish the same thing (lines 114-116, and 164) without the need for pattern 
matching.



core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/AbstractFetcherThread.scala
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/31366/#comment120684>

    Again, foreach would be more idomatic, or take advantage of already being 
in a for loop.


- Eric Olander


On Feb. 24, 2015, 6:02 p.m., Sriharsha Chintalapani wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/31366/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 24, 2015, 6:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1461
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1461
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> KAFKA-1461. Replica fetcher thread does not implement any back-off behavior.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/AbstractFetcherManager.scala 
> 20c00cb8cc2351950edbc8cb1752905a0c26e79f 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/AbstractFetcherThread.scala 
> 8c281d4668f92eff95a4a5df3c03c4b5b20e7095 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaConfig.scala 
> 14bf3216bae030331bdf76b3266ed0e73526c3de 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/OffsetAndDelay.scala PRE-CREATION 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaFetcherThread.scala 
> 6879e730282185bda3d6bc3659cb15af0672cecf 
>   core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/server/ReplicaFetchTest.scala 
> da4bafc1e2a94a436efe395aab1888fc21e55748 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/31366/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sriharsha Chintalapani
> 
>

Reply via email to