[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14363429#comment-14363429
]
Gwen Shapira commented on KAFKA-1809:
-------------------------------------
[~junrao]:
1. Addressed all sub-points
2. I think using actual version numbers in the config is more admin-friendly. I
changed the parseConfig function to just use the 3 significant version numbers.
3. Fixed
4. good catch, that was silly :) fixed.
5. Fixed
6. I had to change this configurationin order to test end-to-end with a
non-default protocol
7. Fixed
8. Yep.
9. Merge bug. Fixed this.
10. TRACE is used for testing only, because it was important to make sure that
things still work when I use the non-default protocol.
For example in SocketServerTest, but also I used it in manual testing.
11. Fixed
12. For performance reasons. Especially when validating the segments at the
end. In current patch I changed it for all replica_testcases.
13. Ick! update metadatarequest was missing from the ser/de test suite! added
it and validated that it catches the issue.
14. Ran system-tests (replica testcases only)
14.2 Ran with console producer and consumer. I'll open a separate JIRA for the
rest of the tools, but I think it can go after we add the security protocol
implementations.
14.3 Opened separate JIRA for this.
> Refactor brokers to allow listening on multiple ports and IPs
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-1809
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1809
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: security
> Reporter: Gwen Shapira
> Assignee: Gwen Shapira
> Attachments: KAFKA-1809.patch, KAFKA-1809.v1.patch,
> KAFKA-1809.v2.patch, KAFKA-1809.v3.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2014-12-25_11:04:17.patch, KAFKA-1809_2014-12-27_12:03:35.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2014-12-27_12:22:56.patch, KAFKA-1809_2014-12-29_12:11:36.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2014-12-30_11:25:29.patch, KAFKA-1809_2014-12-30_18:48:46.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2015-01-05_14:23:57.patch, KAFKA-1809_2015-01-05_20:25:15.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2015-01-05_21:40:14.patch, KAFKA-1809_2015-01-06_11:46:22.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2015-01-13_18:16:21.patch, KAFKA-1809_2015-01-28_10:26:22.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2015-02-02_11:55:16.patch, KAFKA-1809_2015-02-03_10:45:31.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2015-02-03_10:46:42.patch, KAFKA-1809_2015-02-03_10:52:36.patch,
> KAFKA-1809_2015-03-16_09:02:18.patch
>
>
> The goal is to eventually support different security mechanisms on different
> ports.
> Currently brokers are defined as host+port pair, and this definition exists
> throughout the code-base, therefore some refactoring is needed to support
> multiple ports for a single broker.
> The detailed design is here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Multiple+Listeners+for+Kafka+Brokers
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)