The vote opened 5 days ago. I believe we can conclude with 3 binding +1, 3 non-binding +1 and no -1.
Ismael, are you opening and JIRA and migrating? Or are we looking for a volunteer? On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 on same repo. > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Edward Ribeiro <edward.ribe...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > +1. As soon as possible, please. :) > > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > +1 on the same repo for code and website. It helps to keep both in > sync. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for the same repo. The closer docs can be to code the more > accurate > > > they > > > > are likely to be. The same way we encourage unit tests for a new > > > > feature/patch. Updating the docs can be the same. > > > > > > > > If we follow Sqoop's process for example, how would small > > > > fixes/adjustments/additions to the live documentation occur without a > > new > > > > release? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I am +1 on same repo too. I think keeping one git history of code / > > doc > > > > > change may actually be beneficial for this approach as well. > > > > > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I prefer same repo for one-commit / lower-barrier benefits. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sqoop has the following process, which decouples documentation > > > changes > > > > > from > > > > > > website changes: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Code github repo contains a doc directory, with the > > documentation > > > > > > written and maintained in AsciiDoc. Only one version of the > > > > > documentation, > > > > > > since it is source controlled with the code. (unlike current SVN > > > where > > > > we > > > > > > have directories per version) > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Build process compiles the AsciiDoc to HTML and PDF > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. When releasing, we post the documentation of the new release > to > > > the > > > > > > website > > > > > > > > > > > > Gwen > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For reference, here is the previous discussion on moving the > > > website > > > > to > > > > > > > Git: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/uyzND11JliU1E8QU92 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People were positive to the idea as Jay said. I would like to > > see a > > > > bit > > > > > > of > > > > > > > a discussion around whether the website should be part of the > > same > > > > repo > > > > > > as > > > > > > > the code or not. I'll get the ball rolling. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pros for same repo: > > > > > > > * One commit can update the code and website, which means: > > > > > > > ** Lower barrier for updating docs along with relevant code > > changes > > > > > > > ** Easier to require that both are updated at the same time > > > > > > > * More eyeballs on the website changes > > > > > > > * Automatically branched with the relevant code > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pros for separate repo: > > > > > > > * Potentially simpler for website-only changes (smaller repo, > > less > > > > > > > verification needed) > > > > > > > * Website changes don't "clutter" the code Git history > > > > > > > * No risk of website change affecting the code > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your thoughts, please. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Aseem Bansal < > > > asmbans...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When discussing on KAFKA-2364 migrating docs from svn to git > > came > > > > up. > > > > > > > That > > > > > > > > would make contributing to docs much easier. I have > contributed > > > to > > > > > > > > groovy/grails via github so I think having mirror on github > > could > > > > be > > > > > > > > useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I think unless there is some good reason it should be a > > > > separate > > > > > > > repo. > > > > > > > > No need to mix docs and code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can try that out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Grant Henke > > > > Software Engineer | Cloudera > > > > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | > linkedin.com/in/granthenke > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Neha > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > Ashish >
