I made a pass of those. KAFKA-2106 and KAFKA-1792 are related to improving the replica assignment. Since they likely involve a KIP discussion, it's probably too late to include them in 0.9.0.0.
KAFKA-2434: This is on the old consumer. Any improvement that we do should probably be on the new consumer. None of the rest of the jiras seems to be a blocker to me though. We can include them if they get fixed before 0.9.0.0, but we probably won't wait for them to be fixed. Thanks, Jun On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Do we want to deprecate anything before 0.9.0 is released? Maybe the old > producer? > > Ismael > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey Jun, > > > > Should we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2390 > in > > 0.9.0? Becket told me that this is one of those patches ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2387) needed for new > consumer > > API. > > > > Thanks, > > Dong > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I'd be interested to see: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch > available, > > we > > > will be using 'old' consumer for some time) > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather > serious, > > > unclear if no longer relevant with new code?) > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to > > fix) > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yep, > > > > > > > > It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list > > (and > > > > not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hello Jason, > > > >> > > > >> Maybe this answers your question: > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > >> > > > >> Kind regards, > > > >> Stevo Slavic. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <j...@squareup.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Jun, > > > >> > > > > >> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move > > > >> straight > > > >> > to 0.9.0.0)? > > > >> > > > > >> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0? > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > >> > Jason > > > >> > > > > >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to > > complete > > > in > > > >> > the > > > >> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all > the > > > >> > blockers > > > >> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0 > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early > October. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Jun > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
