Hey Gwen, Migration plan wasn't really discussed a ton in the previous threads. So it will be great to dive deep and see if there are gaps there. I had some questions, but the details listed on the KIP are great.
It is complex, though the plan outlined in the wiki assumes a zero downtime upgrade assuming that producers and consumers can't be upgraded in tandem. This is typical for companies that have a significant Kafka footprint, like LinkedIn. Thanks, Neha On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hi Anna, > > Thanks for the KIP, especially for the details on all the alternatives and > how we arrived at the proposal. Its really great! > > Can you point me at where the migration plan was discussed? It looks overly > complex and I have a bunch of questions, but if there was a discussion, I'd > like to read up rather than repeating it :) > > Gwen > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Anna Povzner <a...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am opening the voting thread for KIP-32: Add CreateTime and > > LogAppendTime to Kafka message. > > > > For reference, here's the KIP wiki: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-32+-+Add+CreateTime+and+LogAppendTime+to+Kafka+message > > > > And the mailing list threads: > > > > September: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAHrRUm6NMg%3DPh4HAJdxr%3DpmZhfFcD5OEV2yxj3fg%2BXnEBTW%2B3w%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > October: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCAHrRUm7RiBAJxwO15s1tztz%3D15oibO-QJ%2B_w8AxafTnuw3jjCw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > December: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201512.mbox/%3CCAHrRUm4ugxDYzyy26MGRGKpK4hsjT4EKTuu18M3wztYq4PE%3DaQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > > > Thanks > > Anna > > > -- Thanks, Neha
