+1 (binding) My only concern was around compatibility. It seems like the one case it is incompatible would be, at worst, an extremely unusual edge case (and I *think* can be restricted further to "not source compatible for anyone extending the affected classes / interfaces and override affected methods").
-Ewen On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Xavier Léauté <xav...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to start the vote for KIP-100 unless there are any more > comments. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 100+-+Relax+Type+constraints+in+Kafka+Streams+API > > corresponding PR here https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2205 > > Thanks, > Xavier >
