+1 (non-binding)
> On 12 Dec 2016, at 15:35, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 at 08:07 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> My only concern was around compatibility. It seems like the one case it
>> is
>>> incompatible would be, at worst, an extremely unusual edge case (and I
>>> *think* can be restricted further to "not source compatible for anyone
>>> extending the affected classes / interfaces and override affected
>>> methods").
>>>
>>> -Ewen
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Xavier Léauté <xav...@confluent.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start the vote for KIP-100 unless there are any more
>>>> comments.
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>>> 100+-+Relax+Type+constraints+in+Kafka+Streams+API
>>>>
>>>> corresponding PR here https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2205
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Xavier
>>>>
>>>
>>
