Dear community,
I would like to get further feedbacks on this KIP (if any).
Cheers
Jeyhun
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 2:36 AM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Mathieu,
>
> I personally agree with your observation, and we have plans to submit a
> KIP like this. If you want to drive this discussion feel free to start
> the KIP by yourself!
>
> Having said that, for this KIP we might want to focus the discussion the
> the actual feature that gets added: allowing to specify different
> TS-Extractor for different inputs.
>
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 2/14/17 4:54 PM, Mathieu Fenniak wrote:
> > Hi Jeyhun,
> >
> > This KIP might not be the appropriate time, but my first thought reading
> it
> > is that it might make sense to introduce a builder-style API rather than
> > adding a mix of new method overloads with independent optional
> parameters.
> > :-)
> >
> > eg. stream(), table(), globalTable(), addSource(), could all accept a
> > "TopicReference" parameter that can be built like:
> >
> TopicReference("my-topic").keySerde(...).valueSerde(...).autoOffsetReset(...).timestampExtractor(...).build().
> >
> > Mathieu
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Jeyhun Karimov <je.kari...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Dear community,
> >>
> >> I want to share the KIP-123 [1] which is based on issue KAFKA-4144 [2].
> You
> >> can check the PR in [3].
> >>
> >> I would like to get your comments.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68714788
> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4144
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2466
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jeyhun
> >> --
> >> -Cheers
> >>
> >> Jeyhun
> >>
> >
>
> --
-Cheers
Jeyhun
