+1. Thanks! On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > Thanks for driving through this, Rajini :) > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Rajini, > > > > This is great. Thank you. +1 (non-binding) > > > > Roger > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > Thanks for the proposal and for addressing the (sometimes > contradictory) > > > feedback. :) +1 (binding) from me. > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Rajini Sivaram < > rajinisiva...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-124: > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > 124+-+Request+rate+quotas > > > > > > > > The KIP proposes to add request processing time quota to limit CPU > > > > utilization at *<client-id>*, *<user>* or *<user, client-id>* levels > > > > similar to the current bandwidth limiting quotas. The quota takes > into > > > > account the total time spent by the user/client on request handler > and > > > > network threads within a quota window. Quota will be configured as a > > > > per-thread percentage value, which typically indicates the percentage > > of > > > > CPU cores allocated to the user/client. > > > > > > > > The discussion thread is here: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/46c7bbc8f381ebe718b3cce6ed8bdf > > > > 3745df22b0bd88020d70c99813@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > Many thanks to everyone for the feedback and suggestions so far. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rajini > > > > > > > > > > -- -- Guozhang
