+1 On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this: > > > KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should > probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools so > additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP... > > I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing some > standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically > umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a consumer.config > or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for other > tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are > inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward for > future tools. > > I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on the > project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be more > consistent. This has been an issue for many years now... > > -Ewen > > > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 thanks. > > > > Eno > > > On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like > to > > > start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to > > > streams reset tool > > > > > > *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ > > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+ > > 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>* > > > > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Bharat > > > > >
