+1

I also second Ewen comment -- standardizing the common supported
parameters over all tools would be great!


-Matthias

On 5/17/17 12:57 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
> +1
> 
> On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 05:40 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> I mentioned this in the PR that triggered this:
>>
>>> KIP is accurate, though this is one of those things that we should
>> probably get a KIP for a standard set of config options across all tools so
>> additions like this can just fall under the umbrella of that KIP...
>>
>> I think it would be great if someone wrote up a small KIP providing some
>> standardized settings that we could get future additions automatically
>> umbrella'd under, e.g. no need to do a KIP if just adding a consumer.config
>> or consumer-property config conforming to existing expectations for other
>> tools. We could also standardize on a few other settings names that are
>> inconsistent across different tools and set out a clear path forward for
>> future tools.
>>
>> I think I still have at least one open PR from when I first started on the
>> project where I was trying to clean up some command line stuff to be more
>> consistent. This has been an issue for many years now...
>>
>> -Ewen
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 thanks.
>>>
>>> Eno
>>>> On 16 May 2017, at 04:20, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> Given the simple and non-controversial nature of the KIP, I would like
>> to
>>>> start the voting process for KIP-157: Add consumer config options to
>>>> streams reset tool
>>>>
>>>> *https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool
>>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP+
>>> 157+-+Add+consumer+config+options+to+streams+reset+tool>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Bharat
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to