I see three +1s, no +0s and no -1, so the vote passes. Thanks to those who voted and/or commented on the discussion thread.
On 1 September 2017 at 07:36, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > Thank you! +1 (binding). > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:48 AM Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > Hi, Tom, > > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1. Just one more minor comment. It seems that the > > ElectPreferredLeadersResponse > > should expect at least 3 other types of errors : (1) request timeout > > exception, (2) leader rebalance in-progress exception, (3) can't move to > > the preferred replica exception (i.e., preferred replica not in sync > yet). > > > > Jun > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Tom Bentley <t.j.bent...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like to start the vote on KIP-183 which will provide an > > AdminClient > > > interface for electing the preferred replica, and refactor the > > > kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh tool to use this interface. More > > > details here: > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-183+-+Change+ > > > PreferredReplicaLeaderElectionCommand+to+use+AdminClient > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Tom > > > > > >
