Hi Randall, Yes the KIP should be up to date. The VOTE thread is actually running already for more than 2 months. So the only thing we need is the votes. I pinged the vote thread so that it gets more attention.
Thanks & Regards Jakub On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jakub, have you had a chance to update the KIP with the latest changes? > Would be great to start the vote today so that it's open long enough to > adopt before the deadline on Tuesday. Let me know if I can help. > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote: > > > I have been thinking about this a bit more yesterday while updating the > > code. I think you are right, we should use only the prefixed values if at > > least one of them exists. Even I got quite easily confused what setup is > > actually used when the fields are mixed :-). Randall was also in favour > of > > this approach. So I think we should go this way. I will update the KIP > > accordingly. > > > > > > > I'm fine with consistency, but maybe the thing to do here then is to > > ensure > > > that we definitely log the "effective" or "derived" config before using > > it > > > so there is at least some useful trace of what we actually used that > can > > be > > > helpful in debugging. > > >
