+1 (non-binding). Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Stephane Maarek < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding). Thanks Ismael! > > On Thu., 19 Apr. 2018, 2:47 pm Gwen Shapira, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I started a discussion last year about bumping the version of the June > > 2018 > > > release to 2.0.0[1]. To reiterate the reasons in the original post: > > > > > > 1. Adopt KIP-118 (Drop Support for Java 7), which requires a major > > version > > > bump due to semantic versioning. > > > > > > 2. Take the chance to remove deprecated code that was deprecated prior > to > > > 1.0.0, but not removed in 1.0.0 (e.g. old Scala clients) so that we can > > > move faster. > > > > > > One concern that was raised is that we still do not have a rolling > > upgrade > > > path for the old ZK-based consumers. Since the Scala clients haven't > been > > > updated in a long time (they don't support security or the latest > message > > > format), users who need them can continue to use 1.1.0 with no loss of > > > functionality. > > > > > > Since it's already mid-April and people seemed receptive during the > > > discussion last year, I'm going straight to a vote, but we can discuss > > more > > > if needed (of course). > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dd9d3e31d7e9590c1f727ef5560c93 > > > 3281bad0de3134469b7b3c4257@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Gwen Shapira* > > Product Manager | Confluent > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog> > > >
