Hey Manikumar, This looks good. Do we have to keep the current behavior when handling old DeleteTopics versions? I'm wondering if it would be better to return an UNKNOWN_ERROR (say) and let the client raise that to the user instead of just timing out.
Thanks, Jason On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bumping this thread. > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Waiting for one more binding vote to pass this minor KIP. Appreciate > your > > vote. > > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:03 PM Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (non binding) > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Kamal Chandraprakash < > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:22 PM Magnus Edenhill <mag...@edenhill.se> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > > >> > > 2018-07-04 13:40 GMT+02:00 Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com > >: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Satish. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Daniele Ascione < > >> ascion...@gmail.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > Daniele > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Il giorno mar 3 lug 2018 alle ore 23:55 Harsha <ka...@harsha.io > > > >> ha > >> > > > > scritto: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > > Harsha > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3rd, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com > > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > +1 > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Mickael Maison < > >> > > > > > mickael.mai...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > +1 (non binding) > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Vahid S Hashemian > >> > > > > > > > < vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > --Vahid > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > From: Gwen Shapira < g...@confluent.io > > >> > > > > > > > > To: dev < dev@kafka.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > Date: 07/03/2018 08:49 AM > >> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-322: Return new error code for > >> > > > > > > > DeleteTopics > >> > > > > > > > > API when topic deletion disabled. > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > +1 > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Manikumar < > >> > > > > > manikumar.re...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > > > > >> Fri, Jun 29, 7:59 PM (4 days ago) > >> > > > > > > > >> to dev > >> > > > > > > > >> Hi All, > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> I would like to start voting on KIP-322 which would > >> return > >> > new > >> > > > > error > >> > > > > > > > > code > >> > > > > > > > >> for DeleteTopics API when topic deletion disabled. > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage. > >> > > > > > > > action?pageId=87295558 > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > > > > *Gwen Shapira* > >> > > > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent > >> > > > > > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > >> > > > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter < > >> > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc > >> > > > > > > > >> | blog > >> > > > > > > > > < > >> > > > > > > > > http://www.confluent.io/blog > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
