Thanks, +1 from me.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback, sounds good to me. Updated the KIP.
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 12:04 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > After thinking about it, perhaps a better option is INVALID_REQUEST? I
> > think this is usually used for requests which are malformed in some way,
> so
> > it's a slight abuse, but at least it suggests an incompatibility between
> > what the client is requesting to do and what the server supports.
> > UNKNOWN_SERVER_ERROR, on the other hand, suggests an unexpected condition
> > on the broker.
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > Yes, we can return UNKNOWN_SERVER_ERROR  for older versions.
> > > This will give better developer experience. Updated the KIP.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:02 PM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey Manikumar,
> > > >
> > > > This looks good. Do we have to keep the current behavior when
> handling
> > > old
> > > > DeleteTopics versions? I'm wondering if it would be better to return
> an
> > > > UNKNOWN_ERROR (say) and let the client raise that to the user instead
> > of
> > > > just timing out.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jason
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Manikumar <
> manikumar.re...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Bumping this thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manikumar <
> > manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Waiting for one more binding vote to pass this minor KIP.
> > Appreciate
> > > > > your
> > > > > > vote.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 7:03 PM Eno Thereska <
> > eno.there...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1 (non binding)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Kamal Chandraprakash <
> > > > > >> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 5:22 PM Magnus Edenhill <
> > > mag...@edenhill.se>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > 2018-07-04 13:40 GMT+02:00 Satish Duggana <
> > > > satish.dugg...@gmail.com
> > > > > >:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > +1
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > Satish.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Daniele Ascione <
> > > > > >> ascion...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > +1
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > > Daniele
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Il giorno mar 3 lug 2018 alle ore 23:55 Harsha <
> > > > ka...@harsha.io
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> ha
> > > > > >> > > > > scritto:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > +1.
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > > > Harsha
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3rd, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Ted Yu <
> > > > yuzhih...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Mickael Maison <
> > > > > >> > > > > > mickael.mai...@gmail.com >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > +1 (non binding)
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Vahid S Hashemian
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > < vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > --Vahid
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > From: Gwen Shapira < g...@confluent.io >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > To: dev < dev@kafka.apache.org >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Date: 07/03/2018 08:49 AM
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-322: Return new error
> code
> > > for
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > DeleteTopics
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > API when topic deletion disabled.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:24 AM, Manikumar <
> > > > > >> > > > > > manikumar.re...@gmail.com >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gmail.com >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Fri, Jun 29, 7:59 PM (4 days ago)
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> to dev
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Hi All,
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> I would like to start voting on KIP-322 which
> > would
> > > > > >> return
> > > > > >> > new
> > > > > >> > > > > error
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > code
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> for DeleteTopics API when topic deletion
> > disabled.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > action?pageId=87295558
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Follow us: Twitter <
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> | blog
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > http://www.confluent.io/blog
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to